A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation method of Driver's olfactory preferences: a machine learning model based on multimodal physiological signals. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study investigates how drivers' odor preferences can be assessed using autonomic response signals to improve driving comfort.
  • Six machine learning models were developed to classify these preferences, utilizing a dataset of 132 samples from 33 drivers, focusing on physiological signals like heart rate and skin response.
  • Results show that the decision tree model performed best, achieving an 88% classification accuracy, indicating that processing physiological data can enhance the understanding of drivers' olfactory preferences.

Article Abstract

Introduction: Assessing the olfactory preferences of drivers can help improve the odor environment and enhance comfort during driving. However, the current evaluation methods have limited availability, including subjective evaluation, electroencephalogram, and behavioral action methods. Therefore, this study explores the potential of autonomic response signals for assessing the olfactory preferences.

Methods: This paper develops a machine learning model that classifies the olfactory preferences of drivers based on physiological signals. The dataset used for training in this study comprises 132 olfactory preference samples collected from 33 drivers in real driving environments. The dataset includes features related to heart rate variability, electrodermal activity, and respiratory signals which are baseline processed to eliminate the effects of environmental and individual differences. Six types of machine learning models (Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, Random Forest, K-Nearest Neighbors, and Naive Bayes) are trained and evaluated on this dataset.

Results: The results demonstrate that all models can effectively classify driver olfactory preferences, and the decision tree model achieves the highest classification accuracy (88%) and F1-score (0.87). Additionally, compared with the dataset without baseline processing, the model's accuracy increases by 3.50%, and the F1-score increases by 6.33% on the dataset after baseline processing.

Conclusions: The combination of physiological signals and machine learning models can effectively classify drivers' olfactory preferences. Results of this study can provide a comprehensive understanding on the olfactory preferences of drivers, ultimately enhancing driving comfort.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11688291PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1433861DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

olfactory preferences
24
machine learning
16
physiological signals
12
preferences drivers
12
olfactory
8
learning model
8
assessing olfactory
8
learning models
8
decision tree
8
models effectively
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!