A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Developmental improvements in the ability to benefit from testing across middle childhood. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Extensive research shows that retrieval practice enhances long-term memory, but less is known about how this benefit develops in children aged 7-14.
  • A study tested how these children remember word pairs using either repeated testing or study strategies, finding that older children benefit more from testing during encoding compared to younger ones.
  • The study suggests that while testing benefits improve with age, they are not linked to individual differences in memory skills and may be influenced by changes in sleep patterns during middle childhood.

Article Abstract

Extensive behavioral research on adults has shown that retrieval practice is highly beneficial for long-term memory retention. However, limited evidence exists on the developmental course of this benefit. Here, we present data from a behavioral study involving 7-14-year-old children who had to encode a total of 60 weakly semantically related cue-target word pairs using either repeated retrieval or repeated study encoding strategies. Results revealed age-related increases in the ability to benefit from testing during encoding from early middle childhood to early adolescence. In contrast, repeated study during encoding did not lead to developmental improvements in long-term memory retention across this age range. Individual differences in vocabulary knowledge, short-term memory and working memory were positively associated with long-term memory retention only for those participants who encoded the information via repeated study. These results indicate that (1) the mechanisms determining the testing effect may not be fully in place by early middle childhood, (2) the ability to benefit from testing improves over the middle childhood years, and (3) these benefits are not associated with individual differences in memory and high-cognitive functioning. One potential interpretation of these findings is that changes in sleep-dependent consolidation processes during middle childhood may be critical for understanding the observed developmental differences in ability to enhance long-term memory via the testing effect.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11688304PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2024.1501866DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

middle childhood
20
long-term memory
16
ability benefit
12
benefit testing
12
memory retention
12
repeated study
12
developmental improvements
8
study encoding
8
early middle
8
individual differences
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!