Although we agree that historical myths function to increase cooperation in the groups that share them, we propose that the mechanisms at work may include affective states. We suggest that sharing historical myths can create a felt sense of intimacy, similarity, and security among group members, which increases trust and motivates cooperation, even without particular beliefs about population structure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X24000700 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Myth as model: Group-level interpretive frameworks.
Behav Brain Sci
January 2025
Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA,
I argue that while recruitment might explain some of the design features of historical myths, origin myths in general more importantly provide shared narrative frameworks for aligning and coordinating members of a group. Furthermore, by providing in-group members with shared frameworks for interfacing with the world, the contents of myths likely facilitate the selection of belief systems at the group-level.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe Trojan horse of historical myths: Emotion-driven narratives as a strategy for coalitional recruitment.
Behav Brain Sci
January 2025
School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Perth,
Article Synopsis
- Sijilmassi et al. propose that historical myths function as a cognitive technology that helps gather group support.
- They suggest that this perspective is lacking because it overlooks the importance of human emotions.
- The authors argue that emotion-driven narratives are crucial in fostering teamwork and unity among large groups of people.
Coalitional psychology and the evolution of nationalistic cultures.
Behav Brain Sci
January 2025
Département d'études cognitives, Institut Jean Nicod, ENS, EHESS, PSL University, CNRS, Paris,
The commentaries addressed various aspects of our account of historical myths. We respond by clarifying the evolutionary theory of coalitional psychology that underlies our claims (R1). This addresses concerns about the role of fitness interdependence in large groups (R2), cultural transmission processes (R3), alternative routes to nation-building (R4) and the role of proximal mechanisms (R5).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMyths of trauma and myths of cooperation: Diverse consequences of history for societal cohesion.
Behav Brain Sci
January 2025
Polish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, Warsaw,
We propose that historical myths fall into two distinctive categories: Traumatic and cooperative. Traumatic myths, highlighting collective suffering, can undermine trust and foster conspiracy theories, whereas cooperative myths, emphasizing collective action, enhance group cohesion and within-group coalition building. Psychological and sociological evidence supports these divergent impacts of historical myths both in nations and social movements.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHistorical myths as commitment devices.
Behav Brain Sci
January 2025
Department of Philosophy, Tilburg Center for Moral Philosophy, Epistemology and Philosophy of Science (TiLPS), Tilburg University, Tilburg, The
Sijilmassi et al. claim that historical myths are technologies of recruitment that mimic cues of fitness interdependence. Paradoxically, they also claim that people are vigilant and that these myths might not and do not have to convince others, which raises questions about how these myths become culturally successful.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!