Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Buffer exchange is a critical step in biologics development, playing a pivotal role in removing contaminants, adjusting sample conditions, and facilitating compatibility studies. The efficiency of centrifugal concentrators for polysorbate removal was compared to a two-step approach involving a surfactant removal column followed by buffer exchange. Trastuzumab-pkrb from Herzuma® was used. While a 30 kDa centrifugal concentrator was ineffective in polysorbate removal, a 50 kDa concentrator caused partial removal. Surfactant removal column proved more effective in removing polysorbates. Buffer exchange using polysorbate-containing formulation buffer, even with a 50 kDa concentrator, accumulated polysorbate, revealing the need for a different approach in small-scale formulation. Adding polysorbate in a separate step after buffer exchange appeared to be a good strategy to prevent this problem. The two approaches did not reveal any differences in the protein aggregation behavior.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.125146 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!