Objective: Isolated craniosynostosis of the sagittal suture results in scaphocephaly characterized by a long, narrow skull. Surgical correction of this condition remains debated, particularly regarding the necessity of directly addressing frontal bossing. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of extended strip craniectomy combined with bilateral barrel staving in improving cranial morphology without direct intervention on the forehead.
Methods: This retrospective study included 81 patients diagnosed with isolated sagittal synostosis, treated surgically at an average age of 5.3 months. Three-dimensional photogrammetric scans were obtained 1 day before surgery and 14 days, 3 months, and 12 months postoperatively. The bossing angle, nasofrontal angle, cephalic index, and vertex ratio were analyzed. A control group of age-matched healthy children was used for comparison.
Results: Significant reductions in the bossing angle were observed from preoperatively to 12 months postoperatively, indicating that the intervention contributed to a more normalized cranial shape. The cephalic index increased significantly postoperatively, although it remained lower than that of the control group. The nasofrontal angle remained stable across all time points, with minimal differences between the study and control groups. The vertex ratio decreased significantly over time, suggesting a balanced cranial shape. However, persistent differences between the study and control groups suggest that the intervention did not fully normalize cranial morphology in the short to midterm.
Conclusions: Extended strip craniectomy with bilateral barrel staving, while effective in improving certain aspects of cranial morphology, may not fully equalize cranial shape within the short to midterm. The use of 3D photogrammetry as a noninvasive method for assessing cranial changes is validated in this study and holds promise for broader applications in craniofacial surgery.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2024.10.FOCUS24582 | DOI Listing |
Neurosurg Focus
January 2025
Departments of1Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery and.
Neurosurg Focus
January 2025
Departments of3Plastic Surgery and.
Objective: The surgical management of craniosynostosis varies without consensus on technique or standard outcomes reporting. The authors of this study aimed to investigate current surgical management of craniosynostosis in the United States.
Methods: Two hundred seventy-five surgeons actively treating craniosynostosis in the United States were surveyed.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J
December 2024
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA.
Prior studies have linked the timing of craniosynostosis surgeries to several postoperative outcomes. However, less is known regarding the influence of sociodemographic factors on surgical timing for this population. This study investigates the influence of social vulnerability index (SVI), race, and urbanicity on the timing of craniosynostosis surgery.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Craniofac Surg
December 2024
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY.
Background: Craniosynostosis, a condition involving the premature fusion of cranial sutures, can impair brain development and potentially lead to developmental delays. This study compares open cranial vault remodeling versus endoscopic strip craniectomy treatment for isolated sagittal craniosynostosis, primarily focusing on development outcomes.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary pediatric surgery center, involving all 45 patients treated surgically for isolated sagittal craniosynostosis from 2013 to 2024.
Asian J Neurosurg
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgery, Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
The aim of this study was to determine the impact of helmet therapy (HT) as a treatment for craniosynostosis, with a focus on the outcomes of skull morphology, reoperation rate, complications of HT, and quality of life of patients who receive it. A systematic literature review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The review utilized the PICO format: Does HT following strip craniectomy (SC) improve outcomes (outcome) compared to SC alone (comparison) in patients undergoing craniosynostosis correction (intervention)? Searches were performed from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2022, using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ovid Medline databases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!