Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in the rapid implementation of telemedicine for HIV care at federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) in the United States. We sought to understand use of telemedicine (telephone and video) at two FQHCs in Los Angeles, and the client attitudes towards and experiences with telemedicine as part of future HIV care.
Methods: We conducted surveys with 271 people living with HIV (PLHIV), with questions covering sociodemographic factors, telemedicine attitudes and experiences, technological literacy, and access to technological resources and privacy. Survey data were analyzed utilizing summary statistics, chi-square analyses, and Fisher's exact test to understand associations between sociodemographic factors and telemedicine attitudes and experiences.
Results: Sixty percent of the sample had used any telemedicine and, of these, 93% utilized only telephone visits. Almost all respondents (95%, n = 257) had access to a functioning smartphone and self-rated their technological literacy as high. Most had consistent access to privacy (88%, n = 239), and those without privacy noted this as a barrier to the use of telemedicine. The main benefits of telemedicine (compared to in person) were savings of time and money, convenience, and ability to complete appointments as scheduled. Just over half of PLHIV said they would feel more comfortable discussing sensitive topics (e.g., substance use, relationship issues) in person than over telephone (60%, n = 164) or video (55%, n = 151). Despite limited experience with video telemedicine, half of all participants desired a mix of telephone and video visits as part of their future HIV care.
Conclusions: During a mature phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, PLHIV in our study showed high satisfaction with telemedicine, largely conducted as telephone visits, and high interest in telemedicine visits as a component of their future HIV care. Future studies should explore barriers to implementing video telemedicine in FQHCs and determine telemedicine's impact on clinical outcomes, including engagement and viral suppression.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-10351-x | DOI Listing |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11687067 | PMC |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!