A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

County-Level Factors Associated with Reversal of Insurer-Approved HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Prescriptions in the United States, 2018. | LitMetric

Identifying county-level factors that influence pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) adherence is critical for ending the HIV epidemic in the United States (US). PrEP primary reversal is a term used to describe patients who do not obtain their prescribed medication from the pharmacy. This study sought to identify factors associated with PrEP reversal at the county level in 2018. Data were collected from Symphony Health Analytics, AIDS Vu, the US Census Bureau, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Prevention Information Network. Bivariate Choropleth maps were created to identify counties with high and low levels of PrEP reversal and HIV incidence. This was followed by bivariate analysis to determine the association between predictor variables and percent PrEP reversal. Finally multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the association between percent PrEP reversal and variables that were significant from the bivariate analysis. A total of 308 counties were included in this analysis, where the mean number of PrEP prescriptions for counties was 44, with a median of 14 (Interquartile range 7-34). In the multivariable analysis, counties with higher level of unemployment (aOR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.05-1.16) and rural counties (1.10: 1.04-1.17) had higher odds of PrEP reversal; while counties with higher household crowding (0.97: 0.95-0.99) had lower odds of PrEP reversal. Findings show the need for expanding and implementing programs as well as policies to improve PrEP services that are tailored to local socioeconomic circumstances.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-024-04585-8DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

prep reversal
24
prep
10
county-level factors
8
factors associated
8
reversal
8
pre-exposure prophylaxis
8
united states
8
bivariate analysis
8
percent prep
8
counties higher
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!