A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Continuous glucose monitoring among adults with type 2 diabetes receiving noninsulin or basal insulin therapy in primary care. | LitMetric

Continuous glucose monitoring among adults with type 2 diabetes receiving noninsulin or basal insulin therapy in primary care.

Sci Rep

Research & Analytics Department of AMGA (American Medical Group Association), Alexandria, VA, USA.

Published: December 2024

Rates of type 2 diabetes (T2D) continue to rise in the United States, with many patients failing to achieve glycemic targets. Primary care providers often serve as the sole clinician managing diabetes. Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) have shown promise in diabetes management, yet their adoption in primary care settings, especially among patients with T2D not using intensive insulin therapy, remains limited. We sought to evaluate the impact of CGM use on glycemic control in patients with T2D not using insulin and those using basal but not bolus insulin in a primary care setting. CGM use was associated with a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c (-0.62%, p < 0.01) compared with matched controls at 3 months (n = 182). Patients showed improvements in time in range (39.7-61.9%, p < 0.0001), time > 180 mg/dL (60.1-37.9%, p < 0.001), time > 250 mg/dL (27.6-8.5%, p < 0.001), mean estimated glucose value (212 mg/dL to 173 mg/dL, p < 0.001) and glucose management indicator (8.39-7.46%, p < 0.001). CGM use in a primary care setting compared to usual care significantly improved glycemic control in T2D patients not on bolus insulin, irrespective of treatment with non-insulin or basal insulin. This suggests potential for broader CGM integration in primary care.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83548-4DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686249PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary care
16
continuous glucose
8
type diabetes
8
insulin therapy
8
patients t2d
8
glucose monitoring
4
monitoring adults
4
adults type
4
diabetes
4
diabetes receiving
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!