Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Higher soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) levels are associated with adverse outcomes in chronic heart failure (HF).
Objectives: The authors assessed the association between proteomics-based suPAR levels and incident HF risk in the general population.
Methods: In 40,418 UK Biobank participants without HF or coronary artery disease at enrollment, the association between Olink-based suPAR levels measured as relative protein expression levels and incident all-cause, ischemic, and nonischemic HF was analyzed by competing-risk regression, while accounting for all-cause death as a competing risk. The additional variability in incident HF risk attributable to suPAR levels beyond demographics, traditional risk factors, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels was assessed with nested Cox modeling and likelihood ratio testing.
Results: The mean age was 56 years; 45% were male, and 94% were White. During a median follow-up of 13.7 (IQR: 1.5) years, 1,428 (3.5%) incident HF events occurred. Proteomics-based suPAR levels (per 1-SD) were independently associated with incident HF (subdistribution HR (sHR): 1.37, 95% CI: 1.29-1.46), ischemic HF (sHR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.28-1.54), and nonischemic HF (sHR: 1.32, 95% CI: 1.21-1.44) risk, after adjustment for demographics, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, NT-proBNP, and CRP levels. The addition of suPAR levels to a base risk factor model significantly improved the explained variability of incident HF risk ( = 0.76 vs 0.73, < 0.001).
Conclusions: Independent of demographics, traditional risk factors, NT-proBNP, and CRP levels, proteomics-based suPAR levels were significantly associated with incident all-cause, ischemic, and nonischemic HF risk. Proteomics-based measurement of suPAR levels may underestimate the effect size of this relationship.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11683231 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101442 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!