A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Association between physical activity and sedentary behavior and gestational diabetes mellitus: a Mendelian randomization analysis. | LitMetric

Association between physical activity and sedentary behavior and gestational diabetes mellitus: a Mendelian randomization analysis.

Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)

The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

Published: December 2024

Introduction: The evidence of association between physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior (SB) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) remains controversial in observational studies, this study aimed to generate new hypotheses between PA, SB and GDM.

Methods: Our study performed Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to explore the effects of three types of PA (moderate physical activity (MPA), moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), accelerometer-based physical activity (ABPA)), three types of SB (television watching (TV), leisure computer use (PC), driving (DR)) on GDM and the mediating effect of body mass index (BMI). The inverse variance weighted method was used for the major analysis.

Results: In univariate MR analysis, we found that genetically predicted TV and PC among SB were associated with GDM (OR = 1.61, 95%CI 1.21-2.14, = 0.001; OR = 0.71, 95%CI 0.51-0.98 = 0.037), whereas DR and MP were not (OR = 1.68, 95%CI 0.21-13.3, = 0.623; OR = 1.20, 95%CI 0.87-1.65, = 0.271). However, no association was found between physical activity and GDM: MPA (OR = 0.40, 95%CI 0.08-2.06, = 0.273), MVPA (OR = 0.96, 95%CI 0.58-1.57, = 0.861), and ABPA (OR = 0.99, 95%CI 0.90-1.09, = 0.838). Multivariate MR analysis found DM (OR = 1.64, 95%CI 1.13-2.36, = 0.008) and that BMI was a mediating factor with a 62% mediating effect.

Conclusions: This study proposes a new hypothesis for the association between TV and GDM, which is mediated by BMI, providing evidence for reducing the risk of GDM during pregnancy by reducing television watching time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11682963PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1389453DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

physical activity
24
association physical
8
activity sedentary
8
sedentary behavior
8
behavior gestational
8
gestational diabetes
8
diabetes mellitus
8
mendelian randomization
8
randomization analysis
8
three types
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!