Substantial evidence supports that delay of surgery after breast cancer diagnosis is associated with increased mortality risk, leading to the introduction of a new Commission on Cancer quality measure for receipt of surgery within 60 days of diagnosis for non-neoadjuvant patients. Breast cancer subtype is a critical prognostic factor and determines treatment options; however, it remains unknown whether surgical delay-associated breast cancer-specific mortality (BCSM) risk differs by subtype. This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess whether the impact of delayed surgery on survival varies by subtype (hormone [HR] + /HER2 -, HR -/HER2 -, and HER2 +) in patients with loco-regional breast cancer who received surgery as their first treatment between 2010 and 2017 using the SEER-Medicare database. Exposure of this study was continuous time to surgery from diagnostic biopsy (TTS; days) in reference to TTS = 30 days. BCSM were evaluated as flexibly dependent on continuous time (days) to surgery from diagnosis (TTS) using Fine and Gray competing-risk regression models, respectively, by HR status. Inverse propensity score-weighting was adjusted for demographic, clinical, and treatment variables impacting TTS. Adjusted BCSM risk grew with increasing TTS across all subtypes; however, the pattern and extent of the association varied. HR + /HER2 - patients exhibited the most pronounced increase in BCSM risk associated with TTS, with approximately exponential growth after 42 days, with adjusted subdistribution hazard ratios (sHR) of 1.21 (95% CI: 1.06-1.37) at TTS = 60 days, 1.79 (95% CI: 1.40-2.29) at TTS = 90 days, and 2.83 (95% CI: 1.76-4.55) at TTS = 120 days. In contrast, both HER2 + and HR -/HER2 - patients showed slower, approximately linear growth in sHR, although non-significant in HR -HER2 -.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-024-01949-9 | DOI Listing |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11686992 | PMC |
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Men's Health Inequities Research Lab, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Importance: Research indicates that social drivers of health are associated with cancer screening adherence, although the exact magnitude of these associations remains unclear.
Objective: To investigate the associations between individual-level social risks and nonadherence to guideline-recommended cancer screenings.
Design, Setting, And Participants: This cross-sectional study used 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 39 US states and Washington, DC.
Arch Pharm Res
January 2025
Laboratory of Biochemistry and Immunology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, 28644, Republic of Korea.
Despite significant progress in the field of human breast cancer research and treatment, there is a consistent increase in the incidence rate of 0.5 percent annually, posing challenges in the development of effective novel therapeutic strategies. The failure rate of drugs in clinical trials stands at approximately 95%, primarily attributed to the limitations and lack of reliability of existing preclinical models, such as mice, which do not mimic human tumor biology.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCurr Treat Options Oncol
January 2025
Department of Pharmacognosy, JSS College of Pharmacy, JSS Academy of Higher Education & Research, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.
Integrating clinical datasets in breast cancer research emerges as a necessary tool for advancing our knowledge of the disease and enhancing patient outcomes. Synthesizing diverse datasets offers advantages, from facilitating evidence-based insights to enabling predictive analytics and precision medicine strategies. Crucially, effective integration of clinical datasets necessitates collaborative efforts, policy interventions, and technological advancements to elevate global standards of breast cancer care.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCancer Causes Control
January 2025
North Valley Breast Clinic, 1335 Buenaventura Blvd, Suite 204, Redding, CA, 96001, USA.
Objectives: Automated breast ultrasound imaging (ABUS) results in a reduction in breast cancer stage at diagnosis beyond that seen with mammographic screening in women with increased breast density or who are at a high risk of breast cancer. It is unknown if the addition of ABUS to mammography or ABUS imaging alone, in this population, is a cost-effective screening strategy.
Methods: A discrete event simulation (Monte Carlo) model was developed to assess the costs of screening, diagnostic evaluation, biopsy, and breast cancer treatment.
Ann Surg Oncol
January 2025
Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Background: Flat epithelial atypia (FEA), a rare breast proliferative lesion, is often diagnosed following core biopsy (CB) of mammographic microcalcifications. In the prospective multi-institution TBCRC 034 trial, we investigate the upgrade rate to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive cancer following excision for patients diagnosed with FEA on CB.
Patients And Methods: Patients with a breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) ≤ 4 imaging abnormality and a concordant CB diagnosis of FEA were identified for excision.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!