Background Pediatric migraine is a primary headache affecting daily activities and causing significant disability among children. However, clarity on the usage of prophylactic medications in children is yet to be established. This study was conducted with the aim of comparing the efficacy and safety of flunarizine and propranolol in the prophylaxis of pediatric migraine. Methodology An open-label randomized trial with parallel group assignment was conducted in the Department of Pediatrics of a tertiary care hospital in Northern India among patients aged five to 14 years with migraine having Pediatric Migraine Disability Assessment (PedMIDAS) score of 11 to 139 and a headache frequency of four or more days over a baseline period of 28 days. Enrolled patients were assigned randomly to receive either flunarizine (5 mg/day HS for the first month and then 10 mg/day HS for the next two months) or propranolol (1 mg/kg/day in two divided doses for three months) and then followed up monthly for three months for outcomes. The primary outcome was the proportion of children with a 50% or more reduction in the number of headache days compared to the 28-day baseline period with the last 28 days of the 12-week trial period. Secondary outcomes were headache-related disability (as measured by the absolute change in PedMIDAS score), the absolute change in the number of headache days, and the proportion and nature of adverse effects in the two groups. Results A total of 40 patients underwent randomization (20 in each group). Baseline parameters were comparable in the two groups. The primary outcome, that is, a 50% or more reduction in the number of headache days, was achieved in 10 out of 20 (50%) patients in the flunarizine group and 11 out of 20 (55%) patients in the propranolol group (p = 0.752). Both groups were comparable in terms of the primary outcome. There were also no significant between-group differences in terms of headache-related disability (change in PedMIDAS: 8.2 ± 2.97 in the flunarizine group vs 8.7 ± 3.95 in the propranolol group, p = 0.924) and absolute reduction in the number of headache days (4.3 ± 2.36 in the flunarizine group vs 4.3 ± 2.11 in the propranolol group, p = 0.989). Minor adverse effects like nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, and fatigue were comparable in the two groups. None of the patients reported any serious adverse events. Conclusion Flunarizine is as effective as propranolol for the prophylactic management of children with migraine. Both drugs were well-tolerated and safe.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672219PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74563DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pediatric migraine
16
number headache
16
headache days
16
primary outcome
12
flunarizine group
12
propranolol group
12
propranolol prophylaxis
8
prophylaxis pediatric
8
open-label randomized
8
randomized trial
8

Similar Publications

Background Pediatric migraine is a primary headache affecting daily activities and causing significant disability among children. However, clarity on the usage of prophylactic medications in children is yet to be established. This study was conducted with the aim of comparing the efficacy and safety of flunarizine and propranolol in the prophylaxis of pediatric migraine.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective The objective is to give an update on the current state of research on the genetics of primary headache in children and adolescents. Background Investigations of the genetics of migraine in adults have changed our understanding of the pathophysiology of migraine, but knowledge from our adult patients cannot be directly applied to pediatric patients. Methods The study was conducted through searches of PubMed and Web of Science.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Psychogenic fever and neurodevelopmental disorders among Japanese children.

Biopsychosoc Med

December 2024

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.

Background: Psychosocial stress can induce various physical symptoms, including fever, which is a commonly seen symptom in pediatric practice. In cases of unexplained fever, psychogenic fever should be considered as a potential cause. Children with neurodevelopmental disorders may be more vulnerable to stress and therefore more prone to developing somatic symptoms than their peers.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: Several studies examined stress factors in both adult and pediatric patients with migraine, but few of them have analyzed coping strategies adopted to deal with stressful events in pediatric age. In particular, some of these studies have focused on specific migraine populations or have not employed standardized instruments. Our study used a standardized tool to investigate the coping strategies adopted by patients with primary migraine in dealing with stressful events.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!