Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The study evaluated the efficacy of HPV 16/18 E6/E7 mRNA detection in women with abnormal cervical histology. A total of 99 cervical biopsy samples were analyzed, including 49 benign, 16 with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1), 9 with CIN2/3, and 25 with cervical cancers. Samples were tested for HPV 16/18 using both DNA and mRNA RT-PCR methods. The findings revealed a sensitivity of 85.3 % (29/34) for the HPV DNA test and 76.5 % (26/34) for the mRNA test in detecting CIN2+ lesions. Notably, the E6/E7 mRNA test demonstrated greater specificity for CIN2+ at 75.4 % (49/65), compared to 52.3 % (34/65) for the DNA test. The prevalence of positive results for both tests increased with the severity of squamous cell abnormalities. However, the HPV 16/18 E6/E7 mRNA test provided superior specificity, making it a more effective method for cervical cancer screening in this region, offering more precise results than DNA testing alone.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2024.116668 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!