Purpose: To investigate the physiological characteristics of freestyle snowboard and freeski athletes and explore potential differences between males and females.
Methods: National-team athletes, snowboard (9 males, 21 [2.3] y; 8 females, 20 [4.1] y) and freeski (10 males, 21 [2.1] y; 8 females, 18 [2.2] y), underwent physiological assessments: maximal oxygen uptake (V˙O2max; indirect), countermovement-jump height, drop-jump (DJ) height, DJ contact time, reactive strength index, absolute peak force (PFabs), and relative peak force. Differences were analyzed using multivariate analyses of variance Wilks lambda (Λ) and magnitude with partial-eta squared (ηp2). Pairwise comparisons and the impact of sex and sport were analyzed with univariate tests, utilizing Cohen d.
Results: No physiological differences were found between snowboard and freeski (Wilks Λ = 0.8, P > .251, ηp2 = .169). Sex differences were observed (Wilks Λ = 0.2, P < .001, ηp2=.79), without an interaction between sex and sport (Λ = 0.8, P > .449, ηp2=.120). For snowboard, sex differences included V˙O2max (P < .001, d = 1.04), countermovement-jump height (P < .001, d = 2.5), DJ height (P < .001, d = 1.45), DJ contact time (P < .001, d = 0.36), reactive strength index (P < .001, d = 1.36), front-limb PFabs (P < .001, d = 1.77), rear-limb PFabs (P < .001, d = 1.36), front-limb relative PF (P < .003, d = 0.88), and rear-limb relative PF (P < .021, d = 0.65). In freeski, differences included V˙O2max (P = .005, d = 0.81), countermovement-jump height (P < .001, d = 1.3), DJ height (P < .001, d = 1.17), DJ contact time (P < .040, d = 0.54), reactive strength index (P < .001, d = 1.0), left-limb PFabs (P < .001, d = 2.2), right-limb PFabs (P < .001, d = 1.88), left-limb relative PF (P < .001, d = 1.1), and right-limb relative PF (P < .001, d = 1.33).
Conclusions: Differences between the sexes, rather than between sports, explained the largest variance. A broad concurrent training approach with the aim of developing resilient athletes is likely warranted while acknowledging and adapting to individual needs.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0127 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Physiological Characteristics of Freestyle Snowboard and Freeski Athletes.
Int J Sports Physiol Perform
December 2024
Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyvaskyla, Finland.
Purpose: To investigate the physiological characteristics of freestyle snowboard and freeski athletes and explore potential differences between males and females.
Methods: National-team athletes, snowboard (9 males, 21 [2.3] y; 8 females, 20 [4.
Unilateral Maximal Isometric Hex Bar Pull Test: Within-Session Reliability and Lower Body Force Production in Male and Female Freeski Athletes.
Front Sports Act Living
August 2021
Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
The aim of the study was to (1) assess the within-session reliability of a unilateral isometric hex bar pull (UIHBP) maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) test and, (2) determine unilateral isometric absolute peak force (PF) and relative peak force (PF) values in freeski athletes. Twenty-one male and eight female academy to national team freeskiers performed the novel UIHBP MVC task on a force plate and PF and relative PF were assessed (1000 Hz). Within-session measures of PF offered high reliability on left and right limbs for males ( = 0.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBone and body characteristics of freestyle and non-freestyle skiers.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness
January 2022
University of Colorado School of Medicine, Division of Sports Medicine and Shoulder Surgery, Department of Orthopedics, Aurora, CO, USA.
Background: Freestyle skiers must optimize their aerial performance by maintaining the strength and coordination to propel themselves in the air and adapt to landings and take-offs on uneven surfaces. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and body composition in freestyle skiers and non-freestyle skiing controls. We hypothesized that the unique demands and summation of forces experienced by freestyle athletes would manifest as greater femoral neck aBMD, lower percent body fat, and lower Body Mass Index (BMI) than non-freestyle skiing controls.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!