Background: The prehospital use of blood lactate measurements is increasing. However, the test's benefits have not been methodically evaluated in non-trauma patients. This study had three aims: (1) To assess the evidence of prehospital blood lactate measurements' prognostic value in non-trauma patients, (2) to investigate to what extent the test changed early patient treatment, and (3) to evaluate the healthcare personnel's attitude towards the test.
Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched until Aug 26, 2023. Cohort and randomized controlled trials assessing ≥ 20 acute non-trauma patients with prehospital lactate measurements were included if they reported (1) prognostic outcomes such as short-term mortality or (2) changes in early patient treatments. All study designs were included to assess (3) the healthcare personnel's opinion on prehospital lactate measurements. The risks of bias were assessed using the QUIPS tool, the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the RoB-2. Study registration number CRD42020167169 (PROSPERO).
Results: We screened 6028 study reports. We included 15 studies on (1) the prognostic value of prehospital lactate measurements. Elevated blood lactate levels were correlated to a higher short-term mortality risk in most of the studies but not in studies with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. The 15 prognostic studies were all cohort studies with moderate or high risks of bias. Four studies investigated (2) early treatment changes. They found that the prehospital lactate measurement may have changed early treatment in sepsis patients. However, all four studies on treatment changes were at high risk of bias. Four studies were included on (3) the healthcare personnel's attitude towards the lactate measurement. Evidence of the healthcare personnel's opinion on prehospital lactate measurements was scarce.
Conclusion: Most acute non-trauma patients with elevated prehospital lactate levels had increased risks of short-term mortality, except OHCA patients. Few studies suggested that measuring prehospital lactate levels could change early patient care, particularly in patients with suspected sepsis. The certainty of the evidence is low in this systematic review. The included studies were heterogeneous, and many had high risks of bias. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of prehospital lactate measurements on patient care.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01310-1 | DOI Listing |
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11670429 | PMC |
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med
December 2024
Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Background: The prehospital use of blood lactate measurements is increasing. However, the test's benefits have not been methodically evaluated in non-trauma patients. This study had three aims: (1) To assess the evidence of prehospital blood lactate measurements' prognostic value in non-trauma patients, (2) to investigate to what extent the test changed early patient treatment, and (3) to evaluate the healthcare personnel's attitude towards the test.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiagnostics (Basel)
November 2024
Combat Wound Care, United States Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3698 Chambers Pass, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, Houston, TX 78234, USA.
Background/objectives: Blood lactate concentration is often used to assess systemic hypoperfusion, tissue hypoxia, and sepsis in trauma patients and serves as a prognostic indicator and marker of response to therapy. Point-of-care (POC) devices provide rapid lactate measurements with a single drop of blood. In this study, lactate values from whole blood, measured with two POC devices, Abbott i-STAT and the Nova Biomedical Lactate (LA) Plus™ meter, are compared.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Bioeng Biotechnol
November 2024
Organ Support and Automation Technologies Group, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research, San Antonio, TX, United States.
Introduction: Hemorrhage remains the leading cause of preventable death on the battlefield. The most effective means to increase survivability is early hemorrhage control and fluid resuscitation. Unfortunately, fluid resuscitation requires constant adjustments to ensure casualty is properly managed, which is often not feasible in the pre-hospital setting.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFVox Sang
November 2024
Department of Paramedicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Background And Objectives: In the setting of trauma and suspected critical bleeding, indications to commence blood transfusions remain unclear, with high rates of potentially avoidable transfusions. Prehospital blood lactate measurements could help predict the need for blood transfusions. The aim of this study was to compare measurements detected by a point-of-care (POC) lactate device with laboratory measured lactate levels.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFResusc Plus
December 2024
Department of Clinical Acute and Emergency Medicine, Kliniken Maria Hilf Mönchengladbach, Academic Teaching Hospital of RWTH Aachen University, Germany.
Aim: Guidelines recommend supraglottic airways (e.g. laryngeal tube, LT) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) if providers are not skilled in endotracheal intubation (ETI).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!