A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Delayed postoperative impedance issues in patients treated with deep brain stimulation: A single-center retrospective study. | LitMetric

Background: In rare circumstances, an implanted deep brain stimulation device will develop impedance issues across its contacts. Even more rare is the resultant inability to program a patient effectively, or that the patients' prior programming settings become unusable.

Objective: In this study we investigate this occurrence across the device manufacturers implanted, and whether this could be resolved.

Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of all patients managed with DBS at HMH-Jersey Shore University Medical Center from October 2021 to January 2024.

Results: A total of 155 DBS patients were identified; thirty four patients with the Abbott system and 121 with the Medtronic system. Upon follow-up, 16 independent impedance issues were identified from 12 patients. Two patients (1.7 %) from the Medtronic group and 10 patients (29.4 %) from the Abbott group (p < .01). Falls were the most common significant event noted and occurred prior to 5 impedance issues (31.3 %). When falls were controlled for, 9 patients (11 impedance issues) were identified. All of these patients were from the Abbott group (p < 0.01). Revision surgery occurred in 7 (63.6 %) of these cases after an average of 1.05 years following primary implantation. Surgical replacement of the internal pulse generator (IPG) (n = 3), IPG and extension wires (n = 2), or IPG and lead revision (n = 1) resolved impedance in 6 cases.

Conclusion: Patients with the Abbott St. Jude DBS Systems have significantly higher rates of impedance issues requiring reoperation when compared to those implanted with the Medtronic Systems.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108702DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

impedance issues
12
deep brain
8
brain stimulation
8
patients
7
delayed postoperative
4
postoperative impedance
4
issues patients
4
patients treated
4
treated deep
4
stimulation single-center
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!