Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) seek to improve health equity for marginalized and historically disenfranchised communities. However, FQHC policies are not necessarily designed to be explicitly anti-racist. This can result in institutional racism shaping and influencing policy. FQHCs motivated to engage racism-conscious policy need anti-racism policy analyses. We applied one such method to an FQHC's operations manual: Critical, Anti-Racist, and Discourse Analysis (CARDA). Using CARDA, three themes were identified, describing pathways along which institutional racism might be reified: (a) procedures for actions were specified but no specific position was listed as responsible, (b) policies written in passive voice, and (c) absence of explicit delineation of workflow responsibilities. Dismantling institutional racism requires analyzing policies that have potential for unintended effects. Cultivating clear policies and procedures for addressing harm and naming positions responsible for implementation of policy and procedure builds accountability, trust, and relationships between institutions and communities.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/15248399241308196DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

institutional racism
12
critical anti-racist
8
anti-racist discourse
8
discourse analysis
8
federally qualified
8
qualified health
8
policy
5
analysis applied
4
applied federally
4
health center
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!