AI Article Synopsis

  • Using MRI-fusion guided prostate biopsy (PB) leads to better agreement with prostatectomy histopathology results compared to traditional 12-core TRUS biopsy, especially in patients with higher-risk prostate cancer.
  • In a study involving 218 men diagnosed with prostate cancer, those who underwent MRI-fusion PB had a significantly higher concordance rate (73.1% vs. 42.9%) with the final pathology from surgery.
  • The research highlighted that the number of cancer-involved regions in the prostate is an important factor influencing concordance, indicating that MRI-fusion techniques enhance diagnostic accuracy and treatment planning for patients.

Article Abstract

Introduction: The prostate biopsy (PB) results should be concordant with prostatectomy histopathology to avoid overestimating or underestimating the disease, leading to inappropriate or undertreatment of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Since the introduction of multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) in the diagnostic pathway of PCa, most studies have shown that MRI/Ultrasound fusion-guided (MRI-fusion) PB improves concordance with histopathology of radical prostatectomy specimens. This study aimed to evaluate the improvement in concordance of prostatectomy specimens with PB histopathology obtained using the MRI-fusion approach compared with the 12-core TRUS-Bx and to identify the variables influencing this.

Patients And Methods: The study included 218 men who were diagnosed with PCa by PB and underwent radical prostatectomy between 2016 and 2023. The patients were grouped based on the biopsy method: 115 underwent TRUS-Bx, and 103 underwent MRI-fusion PB. The histopathological grading of these biopsy approaches was compared with that of radical prostatectomy specimens. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of various criteria on histopathological concordance.

Results: In patients with unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk PCa, MRI-fusion PB showed significantly better concordance with prostatectomy histopathology than TRUS-Bx (73.1% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.018). MRI-fusion PB had a significantly lower downgrading of prostatectomy histopathology than TRUS-Bx in all grade categories. The number of cancer-involved regions of the prostate is an independent predictor for concordance (OR = 1.24, 95%CI = 1.04-1.52, p = 0.02) and downgrading (OR = 0.46, 95%CI = 0.24-0.83, p = 0.01).

Conclusions: Using an MRI-fusion PB improves histopathological concordance in patients with unfavorable intermediate and high-risk PCa. It reduces the downgrading rate of prostatectomy histopathology compared with TRUS-Bx in all grade categories. The number of cancer-involved regions is an independent predictor of the concordance between biopsy and final histopathology after prostatectomy and post-prostatectomy histopathology downgrading. Our findings could assist in selecting PCa patients for AS and focal treatment based on the histopathology obtained from the MRI-fusion PB.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668676PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1496479DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radical prostatectomy
16
prostatectomy specimens
16
prostatectomy histopathology
16
histopathology
10
prostatectomy
10
regions prostate
8
prostate biopsy
8
pca patients
8
mri-fusion improves
8
concordance prostatectomy
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!