Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy among marginalized populations particularly in the Hispanic community over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic has presented as a public health issue. This study examined the relationship between political affiliation and vaccination decisions of Hispanic adults in Pima County, Arizona.

Methods: Between January and October 2022, 623 participants completed surveys in English or Spanish after completing informed consent process. Information collected included sociodemographic, political affiliation and philosophy and COVID vaccination uptake. Participants were recruited at different community events in Southern Tucson, Pima County, Arizona. Participants received five dollars for completing the surveys. Data were analyzed with Stata version 16.1.

Results: Participants were 81.8 % Hispanic and 18.2 % non-Hispanic. On average, participants were 32.9 (SD ± 11.8) years of age with a median age of 31 (IQR: 23, 41). Participants who had a bachelor's degree or above had 2.9 times greater odds of being vaccinated compared to those who had less than a high school education (Adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.84; 95 % CI: 1.12, 7.22). Individuals identifying as politically liberal had 3.28 times higher odds of being vaccinated compared to those identifying as conservative (OR = 3.28; 95 % CI: 1.5, 7.16). Similarly, Democrats had 3.36 times higher odds of being vaccinated than Republicans (OR = 3.36; 95 % CI: 1.61, 7.01). People who were strongly religious had statistically significantly lower odds of recommending the vaccine to others as compared to those who self-reported as not being religious.

Conclusions: There was an association with Hispanic adults who aligned liberal or Democrat to express more favorable views toward vaccinations. Additionally, individuals who were more educated, less religious, and in better financial situations tended to be more favorable toward vaccinations in Arizona.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11665536PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100589DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pima county
12
odds vaccinated
12
county arizona
8
political affiliation
8
hispanic adults
8
vaccinated compared
8
times higher
8
higher odds
8
participants
6
odds
5

Similar Publications

Objective: The Enduring Consensus Cervical Cancer Screening and Management Guidelines Committee developed recommendations for the use of extended genotyping results in cervical cancer prevention programs.

Methods: Risks of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse were calculated using data obtained with the Onclarity HPV Assay from large cohorts. Management recommendations were based on clinical action thresholds developed for the 2019 American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy among marginalized populations particularly in the Hispanic community over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic has presented as a public health issue. This study examined the relationship between political affiliation and vaccination decisions of Hispanic adults in Pima County, Arizona.

Methods: Between January and October 2022, 623 participants completed surveys in English or Spanish after completing informed consent process.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Vaccine hesitancy has been ranked as one of the top 10 threats to global health by the World Health Organization. The 5C model (Confidence, Calculation of risk, Complacency, Collective Responsibility, and Constraints) and an accompanying tool to measure vaccine hesitancy, summarize several significant explanatory variables, and move beyond the most common explanatory variable, Confidence.

Methods: From January to May 2021, we administered a cross-sectional survey among adults in Pima County, Arizona in collaboration with the local health department to assess psychological antecedents to (.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Social support and isolation in narcolepsy and idiopathic hypersomnia: An international survey.

Sleep Med

January 2025

Department of Child Neurology and Department of Sleep Medicine, Geisinger Commonwealth School of Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Janet Weis Children's Hospital, Danville, PA, USA.

Article Synopsis
  • The study aimed to evaluate what factors influence the feelings of support for adults diagnosed with narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia.
  • An online survey collected data from 1308 respondents, finding that most participants were young, female, and primarily from the U.S., with a high percentage not knowing anyone else with the same diagnosis at the time of their survey.
  • Ultimately, only 32.3% felt supported in their condition, with social connections being key to feeling supported; younger and married individuals reported higher support levels, while those with certain diagnoses or living outside the U.S. felt less supported.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Latino populations, especially those of Mexican ancestry, face higher rates of both cardiometabolic diseases and food insecurity, compounding negative health outcomes. Food insecurity is associated with poor dietary choices, which not only worsen cardiometabolic health but also contribute to various health complications, making it a critical public health issue in these communities. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of food insecurity and its associations with diet, cardiometabolic risk factors, and glycemic control among Latino individuals of Mexican ancestry.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!