Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 197
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 197
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 271
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1057
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3175
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Although open reduction and internal fixation is the gold standard treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, recent studies have advocated for nonoperative management, citing high rates of reoperation associated with operative intervention. However, no studies have compared nonoperative management to open reduction and internal fixation with dual-plate fixation, which may be associated with lower rates of reoperation compared to single-plate fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare the complications and patient-reported outcomes of dual mini-fragment plate fixation to nonoperative management for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who presented with a displaced midshaft clavicle fracture and underwent either nonoperative management or dual mini-fragment plate fixation from 2010-2021 with minimum 12-month follow-up. The primary outcomes were union complications including nonunion, delayed union, and symptomatic malunion. Secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcomes including visual analog pain scale and subjective shoulder value. A multivariate logistic regression model was utilized to determine the relationship between treatment and union complications.
Results: One hundred and eleven patients were identified (mean age 41.6 ± 16.7 years) with average follow-up of 3.4 years. Of these, 62 underwent dual-plate fixation and 49 underwent nonoperative management with no differences in demographics or fracture characteristics. There were 0 nonunions, 1 delayed union, 0 symptomatic malunions, and 1 reoperation in the dual plating cohort compared to 4 nonunions (P = .035), 1 delayed union (P = 1.00), and 3 symptomatic malunions (P = .083) in the nonoperative cohort. Patients who underwent nonoperative management were over 14 times more likely to develop a union complication (β = 14.3; P = .019). There were no differences between the dual plating and nonoperative cohort with regards to visual analog pain scale (1.2 ± 2.2 vs. 1.5 ± 2.4; P = .559) and subjective shoulder value (90 ± 16 vs. 92 ± 15; P = .671).
Conclusion: While both dual mini-fragment plate fixation and nonoperative management of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures demonstrate similarly excellent patient-reported pain and functional outcomes, dual-plate fixation has a 14-fold lower risk of union complications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.10.018 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!