AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate the most reliable evidence for managing X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) in adults to help shape treatment recommendations.
  • After reviewing over 4,000 records, only one clinical trial and two observational studies met the criteria, showing that burosumab likely helps with pain from fractures but has a limited effect on other symptoms like fatigue and stiffness.
  • There are currently no strong comparisons between burosumab and conventional treatments, highlighting a significant gap in data regarding their long-term effectiveness on important patient outcomes.

Article Abstract

Objective: To examine the highest certainty evidence addressing the management of X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) in adults to inform treatment recommendations.

Methods: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central up to May 2023. Eligible studies included RCTs and observational studies of individuals 18+ with clinically or genetically confirmed XLH. Manuscripts comparing burosumab to no treatment or conventional therapy (phosphate and active vitamin D) and conventional therapy to no treatment were included. Two reviewers independently determined eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB). GRADE methodology was used to assess evidence certainty.

Results: We screened 4,114 records, after removing duplicates, and assessed 254 full texts. One RCT and two observational studies were eligible. The RCT of burosumab versus no treatment had low RoB. Burosumab probably improves pain from fracture/pseudofracture healing (moderate certainty) but has little or no impact on direct pain measures (moderate certainty). Burosumab may reduce the need for parathyroidectomy (low certainty) but has little or no impact on fatigue (high certainty), stiffness (moderate certainty), and mobility (low certainty) over 24 weeks. Burosumab may increase dental abscess risk (low certainty). Indirect evidence comparing burosumab to conventional therapy provided low certainty regarding burosumab versus conventional therapy. Two observational studies on conventional therapy versus no treatment had high RoB and very low certainty regarding the impact of conventional therapy on patient-important outcomes.

Conclusion: No formal comparisons between burosumab and conventional therapy in adults exist. Evidence for conventional therapy versus no treatment is very uncertain. Our review highlights the need for more data on the long-term effects of burosumab and conventional therapy on patient-important outcomes in adult patients with XLH.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae890DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

conventional therapy
36
low certainty
20
observational studies
12
versus treatment
12
moderate certainty
12
certainty impact
12
burosumab conventional
12
therapy
10
certainty
10
burosumab
9

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!