X-ray crystal diffraction has provided atomic-level structural information on biological macromolecules. Data quality determines the reliability of structural models. In most cases, multiple data sets are available from different crystals and/or collected with different experimental settings. Reliable metrics are critical to rank and select the data set with the highest quality. Many measures have been created or modified for data quality evaluation. However, some are duplicate in functionality, and some are likely misused due to misunderstanding, which causes confusion or problems, especially at synchrotron beamlines where experiments proceed quickly. In this work, the capability, significance, effectiveness, and correlations of these measures are studied through both theoretical analysis and experimental data to clarify confusion and misuses, and thus identify the most reliable measures for evaluating data quality from different aspects.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11661158PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.10.627855DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

data quality
16
crystal diffraction
8
quality evaluation
8
data
7
quality
5
i/σi {rmerg
4
{rmerg rmeas
4
rmeas rpim
4
rpim cc1/2}
4
cc1/2} crystal
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!