A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The application of a tool for supporting shared decision making in primiparous women during early labour - a descriptive survey of obstetric health care professionals' opinion. | LitMetric

The application of a tool for supporting shared decision making in primiparous women during early labour - a descriptive survey of obstetric health care professionals' opinion.

BMC Health Serv Res

School of Health Sciences, Research Institute of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, CH-8401, Winterthur, Switzerland.

Published: December 2024

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study explored maternity care providers' satisfaction with a new tool designed to support shared decision-making for women in early labor.
  • A survey was conducted among 607 professionals, but only 110 responded, revealing mixed reviews about the tool's effectiveness and length.
  • Many midwives found the tool complicated and unhelpful, particularly those with more experience and higher workloads, indicating challenges in its implementation and potential threats to their professional competencies.

Article Abstract

Background: Interventions in maternity health care settings often need to be studied within everyday clinical work and with the contributions of the staff. Therefore, the health care workers on-site play an important role for research success. This explains why it is necessary not only to focus on the outcomes of the research project itself, but also to study the whole process.

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate maternity care providers' satisfaction with the use of a preliminary long version of a standardised tool for supporting shared decision making in women during early labour.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was distributed to n = 607 maternity care professionals working in the study sites which applied a tool to support shared decision making in primiparous women in early labour. The data was collected using RedCap®. It was analysed descriptively, and logistic regression modelling was applied to find associations between the application of the tool and care as well as work organisation.

Results: A total of 110 health care professionals answered the online survey including 95 (86.4%) midwives and 15 (15.3%) obstetricians. N = 36 (43.9%) midwives stated that they found the tool helpful in the provision of care, whereas 46 (56.1%) did not agree. There was great dissatisfaction with the length of the preliminary tool. The tool adversely impacted the timely management of early labour care. Midwives with greater work experience (OR 0.82, p = 0.02) and a higher workload (OR 0.97, 0.02) were less likely to agree that the tool facilitates their work organisation. Additionally, midwives with more work experience (OR 0.86) and a higher workload (OR 0.96) found the tool less likely to be useful for care provision. The implementation of the tool was challenging for many midwives (40.2%) and some feel their competencies are threatened by the tool (20.7%).

Conclusions: The involvement of maternity care providers in research is crucial for the success of projects, but they face challenges. Implementing a preliminary tool in clinical practice led to dissatisfaction mainly due to lack of time and partial understanding of its purpose. Providing adequate training and supportive leadership can help improve their understanding and satisfaction.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11662463PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-12096-4DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health care
16
shared decision
12
decision making
12
women early
12
early labour
12
maternity care
12
care
11
tool
11
application tool
8
tool supporting
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!