Background And Aims: Population-based observational studies suggest that endoscopic screening may reduce upper gastrointestinal cancer mortality. We aimed to quantify the effect of endoscopy screening.

Methods: This is a community-based, multicenter, cluster randomized clinical trial conducted in both high-risk and non-high-risk areas of China. Randomization and recruitment occurred between 2015 and 2017, with follow-up conducted until 2022. The intervention was an invitation to receive endoscopic screening, as opposed to receiving usual care (unscreened). In non-high-risk areas, only participants assessed as high-risk by risk scores in the screening group were invited for endoscopic screening. The primary outcome was the cumulative risk of death from upper gastrointestinal cancer, adjusted for baseline characteristics and cluster effects.

Results: A total of 234,635 participants were included in the intention-to-screen analysis, with a median age of 52 years. In high-risk areas, 64,836 individuals from 81 clusters were randomized to the screening group, and 59,379 individuals from 82 clusters were randomized to the control group. In non-high-risk areas, 58,367 individuals from 92 clusters were randomized to the screening group, 52,053 individuals from 90 clusters were randomized to the control group. Among high-risk areas, 480 (adjusted cumulative risk, 0.77%) died due to upper gastrointestinal cancers within 7.5 years in the screening group vs 545 (0.99%) deaths in the control group (risk ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.91). Among non-high-risk areas, adjusted risk was 0.26% (146 deaths) in the screening group and 0.30% (149 deaths) in the control group (risk ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.13).

Conclusions: An invitation to endoscopic screening reduced upper gastrointestinal cancer mortality in high-risk areas. In non-high-risk areas, an invitation to endoscopic screening based on risk scores did not significantly decrease upper gastrointestinal cancer deaths, but longer follow-up time was required. (Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR-EOR-16008577.).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2024.11.025DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

upper gastrointestinal
24
gastrointestinal cancer
20
endoscopic screening
20
non-high-risk areas
20
screening group
20
individuals clusters
16
clusters randomized
16
control group
16
cancer mortality
12
clinical trial
12

Similar Publications

Environmental and Clinical Factors Concerning Gastrointestinal Bleeding: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analyses.

J Am Med Dir Assoc

January 2025

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Second Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.

Objectives: Gastrointestinal bleeding, an emergency and critical disease, is affected by multiple factors. This study aims to systematically summarize and appraise various factors associated with gastrointestinal bleeding.

Design: Umbrella review.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Basophils may as a risk factor for upper gastrointestinal cancer: a Mendelian randomization (MR) study.

Ecancermedicalscience

November 2024

Department of Radiation Oncology, Oncology Center, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, No 253 Mid Gongye Ave, Haizhu District, Guangzhou 510282, Guangdong Province, China.

Objective: Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) cancers, including esophageal (EC) and gastric (GC) cancers, pose a significant global health challenge. Previous studies have indicated a fundamental correlation between basophil count and the risk of UGI cancer. However, confirming a causal relationship demands further investigation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Acute esophageal necrosis (AEN) is an uncommon endoscopic finding characterized by a patchy or diffuse circumferential black pigmentation of the esophageal mucosa, corresponding to ischemic necrosis. It usually presents with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and is thought to be caused by a systemic low blood flow in patients with predisposing risk factors, like advanced age and cardiovascular comorbidities. After initial hemodynamic stabilization, diagnosis is established by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with careful biopsies and histological evaluation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Metastasis of non-gastrointestinal (non-GI) cancers to the upper GI tract is a rare occurrence, with limited cases reported in the literature. Recognising this type of metastasis is crucial, as it presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This case series adds to the literature by discussing seven rare cases of non-GI cancer metastasising to the upper GI tract, emphasising the complications and clinical manifestations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Despite approvals of new first-line immunotherapies for advanced/metastatic gastric cancer/gastroesophageal junction cancer (aGC/GEJC), patients' median survival is around 14 months and their health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is affected by disease-related symptoms and treatment-related side effects. Using a targeted literature review (TLR) and patient interviews, this study identified disease- and treatment-related concepts that are important to patients with aGC/GEJC and their HRQoL.

Methods: A TLR was conducted to identify primary qualitative studies from 2018 to 2021 on patients' experiences with aGC/GEJC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!