Aims: A novel noninvasive score, Agile-4 score, combining liver stiffness measurements, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase, platelet count, diabetes status and sex has been developed for the identification of cirrhosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We assessed the performance of Agile-4 for ruling-in/out liver cirrhosis in MASLD patients.

Materials And Methods: We searched Medline, Cochrane library, Web of science, Scopus and Echosens website up to May 2024. Eligible studies assessed the accuracy of Agile-4 for ruling-in (≥0.565) and ruling-out (<0.251) liver cirrhosis, using biopsy as the reference standard, at predefined thresholds. We calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity estimates for both Agile-4 thresholds alongside 95% confidence intervals following bivariate random-effect models. We assessed the risk of bias using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool.

Results: We included seven studies with 6037 participants. An Agile-4 score ≥0.565 yielded a pooled specificity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.86-0.97). Similarly, an Agile-4 score <0.251 excluded cirrhosis with a summary sensitivity of 0.90 (0.80-0.95). Assuming a cirrhosis prevalence of 30%, the positive predictive value (PPV) for ruling-in cirrhosis was 80%, while the negative predictive value for ruling-out cirrhosis was 95%. Most studies were at high or unclear risk for bias due to concerns regarding patient selection and the blinding status of Agile-4 score interpretation in relation to biopsy results.

Conclusions: Agile-4 score performs well for ruling-in/out liver cirrhosis in MASLD patients. Owing to the relatively low PPV, sequential application of the Agile-4 after fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) testing might further enhance its performance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.16142DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

accuracy agile-4
8
agile-4 score
8
liver cirrhosis
8
cirrhosis patients
8
patients metabolic
8
metabolic dysfunction-associated
8
dysfunction-associated steatotic
8
steatotic liver
8
liver disease
8
liver
5

Similar Publications

Aims: A novel noninvasive score, Agile-4 score, combining liver stiffness measurements, aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase, platelet count, diabetes status and sex has been developed for the identification of cirrhosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). We assessed the performance of Agile-4 for ruling-in/out liver cirrhosis in MASLD patients.

Materials And Methods: We searched Medline, Cochrane library, Web of science, Scopus and Echosens website up to May 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • The study evaluated the accuracy of Agile scores (Agile 3+ and Agile 4) for diagnosing advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), alcohol-related liver disease (ALD), and chronic hepatitis B or C (CHB/C).
  • It included 4,243 patients and found that Agile scores had diagnostic accuracy comparable to liver stiffness measurements (LSM) in MASLD and ALD, but performed less effectively in CHB/C.
  • The results suggest that using Agile scores alongside existing biomarkers like FIB-4 can improve diagnosis by reducing indeterminate results and enhancing specificity for advanced liver conditions.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * The research involved a retrospective analysis of 246 patients, comparing the effectiveness of these new scores against other fibrosis prediction tools like LSM-VCTE, FIB-4, and APRI.
  • * Results show that Agile 3+ and Agile 4 are highly effective in detecting advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, outperforming FIB-4 and matching LSM-VCTE’s accuracy, while the FAST score is moderately effective for identifying fibrotic NASH. *
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background And Aims: We explored 2 novel scores, Agile 3+ and 4, to identify advanced fibrosis (≥F3) and cirrhosis (F4), respectively, in NAFLD and compared their diagnostic performances to liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by vibration-controlled transient elastography and fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) (for Agile 3+).

Approach And Results: This multicenter study included 548 NAFLD patients with laboratory testing, liver biopsy, and vibration-controlled transient elastography within 6 months. Agile 3+ and 4 were applied and compared with FIB-4 or LSM alone.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!