AI Article Synopsis
- The study investigates how much time Japanese clinical residents spend at patients' bedsides and its potential impact on their exam scores.
- A nationwide survey included over 5,300 first- and second-year residents, revealing that 66.9% spent less than 60 minutes per day at the bedside.
- Results indicated a positive correlation between increased time-at-bedside (especially categories C2, C3, and C5) and higher General Medicine In-Training Examination scores, while categories C4 and C6 showed no significant association.
Article Abstract
Background: Time-at-bedside plays a central role in clinical medicine. However, the amount of time Japanese clinical residents spend at patients' bedsides remains unexplored.
Objective: To quantify time-at-bedside and examine its association with in-training examination scores during clinical residency in Japan.
Design: Nationwide multicenter cross-sectional study.
Participants: First- and second-year postgraduate residents who took the General Medicine In-Training Examination at the end of the 2022 academic year.
Interventions: Time-at-bedside was defined as the average time per day the residents spend providing care at patients' bedsides during their residency. Time-at-bedside was classified into six categories: C1 (10-20 min per day), C2 (30-50 min per day), C3 (60-80 min per day), C4 (90-110 min per day), C5 (120-140 min per day), and C6 (150 min or more per day). Data on time-at-bedside were collected through an electronic survey conducted immediately after the General Medicine In-Training Examination.
Main Measures: The primary outcome was the General Medicine In-Training Examination score. A multi-level analysis examined the association between self-reported time-at-bedside and the General Medicine In-Training Examination score.
Key Results: A total of 5344 residents were included in this study. Of these, 2760 were first-year residents, and 2584 were second-year residents. Of the 5334 residents, 66.9% reported spending less than 60 min at a patient's bedside. Compared to the C1, C2 (adjusted score difference [aSD] = 1.1, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.48 to 1.79), C3 (aSD = 1.5, 95% CI 0.75 to 2.20), and C5 (aSD = 2.0, 95 CI 0.62 to 3.38) were positively associated with the General Medicine In-Training Examination score. However, C4 (aSD = 1.1, 95% CI - 0.15 to 2.26) and C6 (aSD = 0, 95% CI - 1.79 to 1.87) were not associated with the General Medicine In-Training Examination score.
Conclusion: Self-reported time-at-bedside positively correlates with in-training examination scores among Japanese resident physicians.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-09244-1 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!