AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to assess factors affecting the implementation of ventilator liberation guidelines for pediatric patients and create a strategy for an international collaborative effort called VentLib4Kids.
  • The survey involved 26 pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) across 18 centers, gathering 409 responses from various healthcare professionals, such as doctors, nurses, and respiratory therapists.
  • Three implementation tiers were established based on consensus about various practices, showing that extubation readiness testing was well-agreed upon, while more complex practices like respiratory muscle strength testing had significant gaps in perception and agreement among respondents.

Article Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate contextual factors relevant to implementing pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines and to develop an implementation strategy for a multicenter collaborative.

Design: Cross-sectional qualitative analysis of a 2023/2024 survey.

Setting: International, multicenter Ventilation Liberation for Kids (VentLib4Kids) collaborative.

Subjects: Physicians, advanced practice providers, respiratory therapists, and nurses.

Interventions: None.

Measurements And Main Results: The survey was distributed to 26 PICUs representing 18 unique centers (17 in North American)-14 general medical/surgical, eight cardiac, and four mixed (1935 solicitations). All 409 responses were analyzed (prescribers 39.8%, nursing 32.8%, and respiratory therapists 27.4%). Three implementation tiers were identified based on perceptions of evidence, feasibility, positive impact, and favorability constructs. Tier A (≥ 80% agreement for all constructs) included extubation readiness testing (ERT) screening, ERT bundle, spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs), upper airway obstruction (UAO) risk mitigation, and risk stratified noninvasive respiratory support (NRS). Tier B (50-79% agreement) included standard risk SBT method, risk stratified SBT duration, and UAO risk assessment. Tier C (< 50% agreement) included high-risk SBT method, respiratory muscle strength testing, and infant NRS. The smallest perceived practice gaps were noted in tier A and the largest in tier C. The smallest practice gap was risk stratified NRS (88% agreement). The largest practice gap was respiratory muscle strength (18% agreement). In regression analysis, independently significant differences in perceptions based on role and unit type for multiple constructs were identified for UAO risk assessment, UAO risk mitigation, risk stratified NRS, and infant NRS.

Conclusions: This survey study of the VentLib4Kids collaborative lays the foundation for phased implementation of the 2023 pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines. Early phases should focus on the best implementation profiles and smallest practice gaps. Later phases should address those that are more challenging. Unit- and role-based tailoring of differences should be considered for some recommendations more than others.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003673DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

uao risk
16
risk stratified
16
risk
9
implementation strategy
8
strategy multicenter
8
multicenter ventilation
8
ventilation liberation
8
liberation kids
8
kids ventlib4kids
8
ventlib4kids collaborative
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!