A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Effectiveness of Peer-Assisted Learning in health professional education: a scoping review of systematic reviews. | LitMetric

Background: Peer-assisted learning (PAL) has been widely implemented for many years worldwide. To further enhance the understanding of available data, a scoping review of systematic reviews was conducted to synthesize existing evidence on the effectiveness of PAL in health professional education, aiming to provide more comprehensive outcomes.

Methods: Nine databases were systematically searched. The review process was guided by the five-stage scoping review framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley. The JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Systematic Reviews and Research Syntheses was used to assess the methodological quality. The results were narratively synthesized and reported following the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model.

Results: 24 systematic reviews (including nine meta-analyses) were included. The majority of these reviews were synthesized using narrative analysis. The application of PAL in health professional education was developed. In the context of evaluation, support for the theory, problem-based drivers, and the need to develop teaching and assessment skills for students were the main reasons for the development of PAL. Inputs for PAL predominantly centered on tutor recruitment and tutor training. Common activities within the PAL process encompassed peer teaching, peer tutoring, peer feedback, peer simulation, peer discussion, peer-led debriefing, peer supervision, and curriculum design. Outcomes of PAL were categorized across peer tutees, peer tutors, health professional educators, and challenges of PAL.

Conclusions: Despite certain challenges, the reciprocal benefits of PAL for peer tutees and tutors are evident. It is recommended that relevant institutions should consider incorporating PAL into the curriculum for health professional students. Future research should aim to develop a more rigorous framework to determine the short- and long-term effects, cost-effectiveness, and generalizability of PAL in health professional education.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11653801PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06434-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

health professional
24
professional education
16
systematic reviews
16
scoping review
12
pal health
12
pal
10
peer
9
peer-assisted learning
8
review systematic
8
peer tutees
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!