Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of different methods of interfacial elastic compression and their association with obesity and chronic venous insufficiency (CVI).
Methods: Forty legs with vascular disease and 40 control legs were analyzed. Four different methods of elastic compression were applied and interface pressure was measured. Blood flow volume and peak systolic velocity (SPV) were measured before and during compression.
Results: Although there are no general differences correlating higher interface pressures with higher blood flow volume and SPV in CVI patients and controls, there are specific differences related to obesity. Obese participants had lower CVI and higher blood flow volume, in whom higher interface pressure promoted better results.
Conclusions: There is no standard method of compression for all patients. Variables such as the presence of CVI, body mass index, and gender must be taken into account in order to achieve a better individual method of compression therapy.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17085381241309944 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!