A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of the peripheral visual performance of DIMS spectacle lenses versus single vision lenses. | LitMetric

Purpose: This study evaluates differences in the visual field performance when wearing the Defocus Incorporated Multiple Segments (DIMS) spectacle lens compared to wearing a conventional single vision (SV) spectacle lens.

Methods: Twenty-one children aged 9-14 years with spherical equivalent refraction (SER) between -1.13D to -4.75D were recruited. Mid-peripheral near visual acuity (NVA) under room lighting condition (500 lux ±10%) was measured using DIMS and SV lenses, respectively. Automated static perimetry (Zeiss, Humphrey Visual Field HFA 750i) with SITA Fast 30-2 protocol was used to investigate the visual field sensitivity. During the test, the study lens (Plano DIMS or SV lens) were inserted into the lens holder in front of the trial lenses with each child's compensated prescription.

Results: Three children were not able to complete the reliable visual tests due to fixation losses (>20%) or high false positive rate (>15%) while 18 children successfully completed the test. The mean visual field sensitivity was 29.2 ± 3.7 decibels (dB) and 29.3 ± 3.5 dB when wearing DIMS and SV lens, respectively. The mean sensitivity differences between DIMS and SV lens among 76 locations ranged from -2.4 ± 3.9 dB to 1.6 ± 3.9 dB. No statistically significant difference in sensitivity was observed across 76 locations within the central 30 between DIMS and SV lens (Wilcoxon signed rank test with bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons,  > 0.00065). Compared to SV lens, 0.05 logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) reduction in mid-peripheral NVA in all 4 quadrants (Superior, Temporal, Inferior and nasal,  < 0.05) was noted with the DIMS lens ( = 18). However, no statistically significant correlation was found between the mid-peripheral NVA and visual sensitivity at the specific locations.

Conclusion: Although the mid-peripheral NVA was slightly reduced using DIMS lens, wearing DIMS lens did not change the children's visual sensitivity to detect the static stimulus within 30 visual field when compared to wearing SV lens.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11650793PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2024.1460062DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

visual field
16
dims lens
16
dims spectacle
8
single vision
8
lens
8
field sensitivity
8
visual
7
dims
7
evaluation peripheral
4
peripheral visual
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!