A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Safety and preliminary efficacy of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on chronic knee pain: A pilot trial. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) may be an innovative treatment for knee osteoarthritis (OA), investigating its safety and preliminary effects on pain relief.
  • A pilot trial with 30 participants found significant reductions in knee pain immediately and shortly after tVNS, with improvements in conditioned pain modulation and heart rate variability, indicating better parasympathetic function.
  • While tVNS shows promise as a non-invasive pain-relief option for knee OA, further research with larger samples is necessary to validate these findings.

Article Abstract

Objective: Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation () may be an innovative treatment for symptoms of knee osteoarthritis (OA) due to possible shared pathological mechanisms between diminished parasympathetic function, central pain mechanisms, and knee pain. Thus, we sought to test the safety and preliminary efficacy of tVNS in people with knee OA.

Design: A pilot trial in which participants received a 60-min tVNS was conducted. At baseline, immediately after, and 15 ​min after tVNS, we assessed knee pain, pressure pain threshold (), temporal summation (), conditioned pain modulation (), and high-frequency power of heart rate variability (). We examined the extent to which these outcome measures changed after tVNS using linear mixed models.

Results: 30 participants with knee OA were included, and all completed the intervention without any major side effects. Compared to baseline, knee pain was reduced by 1.27 (95 ​% CI, -1.74, -0.80) immediately after and by 1.87 (-2.33, -1.40) 15 ​min after tVNS; CPM improved by 0.11 (0.04, 0.19) and 0.07 (-0.01, 0.15); and HF improved by 213.29 (-0.38, 426.96) and 234.17 (20.49, 447.84). PPT and TS were not changed after tVNS.

Conclusions: Our preliminary data demonstrated that tVNS may be a safe pain-relieving treatment for people with knee OA. Our findings suggest that improvement of knee pain might be derived from improvement of parasympathetic function and central pain mechanisms as no local therapy was applied. A large study is needed to confirm that tVNS is a novel intervention to ameliorate knee pain in people with knee OA.

Clinical Trial: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05625178).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647485PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2024.100545DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

knee pain
24
people knee
12
knee
11
pain
10
safety preliminary
8
preliminary efficacy
8
transcutaneous auricular
8
auricular vagus
8
vagus nerve
8
nerve stimulation
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!