Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 143
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 143
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 209
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 994
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3134
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 574
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 488
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: The change of morphokinetic pattern in aneuploid embryos will facilitate the non-invasive selection of euploid embryos. In this study, we investigated the impact of different chromosomal abnormalities on the morphokinetic patterns of embryonic development.
Methods: Our cohort includes 939 time-lapse preimplantation genetic testing cycles performed between January 2019 and July 2022 at a single academic fertility center, with a total of 2876 biopsied blastocysts. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy, time-lapse monitoring, and next-generation sequencing were performed.
Results: After adjusting for patient- and cycle-related factors, ix morphokinetic parameters (t5, P = 0.006; t8, P = 0.048; tSB, P < 0.001; tB,P < 0.001; t5-t2, P = 0.004; tB-tSB, P < 0.001) were significant in multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression model analysis for morphokinetic parameters to predict euploid or aneuploid embryos. None of the patient- or cycle-related factors systematically affected any morphokinetic parameter. Morphokinetic parameters of late cleavage and blastocyst stages in embryos with chromosome fragment deletion (t4 to t8, tB, t5-t2, tB-tSB, ECC2, ECC3, s2, P < 0.05) or duplication (t4, t5, tSB, tB, t5-t2, P < 0.05) were prolonged, and the morphokinetic parameters of the blastocyst stage in monosomic embryos (tSB, tB, tB-tSB, P < 0.01) were prolonged. Partial or complete chromosome 20 or 22 deletion can cause significant delays in multiple parameters of cleavage and blastocyst stages (from t4 to tB, P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Our study found that different chromosomal abnormalities have different effects on the morphokinetic parameters. Significant delays in morphokinetic parameters at different stages were found in fragment-mutated embryos and monosomic embryos. This can provide insights into the pre-implantation development pattern of aneuploid embryos and help non-invasive embryo selection.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647804 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40686 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!