A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

YOLOv8 algorithm-aided detection of patellar instability or dislocation on knee joint MRI images. | LitMetric

Background: Patellar instability (PI) or patellar dislocation (PD) is challenging to diagnose accurately based on medical history and clinical manifestations alone. While X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are commonly employed for detecting PI or PD, computer vision has not yet been widely utilized for this purpose.

Purpose: To explore the feasibility of computer vision, specifically the You Only Look Once (YOLO) algorithm, in identifying patellar instability or dislocation.

Material And Methods: A total of 550 patients (190 diagnosed with patellar instability or dislocation) were divided into a training set (n = 360), validation set (n = 90), and external test set (n = 100). Four indicators were measured on transverse knee MRI scans to determine the presence of patellar instability, and 450 images were labeled using Labelme software. YOLO version 8 (YOLOv8) was refined using these labeled images and validated on 100 unlabeled images. The diagnostic accuracy of YOLOv8 was compared with that of a junior radiologist.

Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the refined YOLO model and the junior radiologist were 62%, 97%, and 83%, and 62%, 82%, and 74%, respectively. Although the YOLO model demonstrated slightly higher accuracy, the difference did not reach statistical significance ( = 0.093). The YOLO model required approximately 14.01 ± 10.34 ms to interpret each image, significantly shorter than the 9.55 ± 2.39 s required by the radiologist ( < 0.001).

Conclusion: The refined YOLOv8 model is not inferior to junior radiologists in identifying patellar instability or dislocation and offers a significantly faster interpretation time.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02841851241300617DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patellar instability
20
yolo model
12
instability dislocation
8
computer vision
8
patellar
6
instability
5
yolo
5
yolov8 algorithm-aided
4
algorithm-aided detection
4
detection patellar
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!