A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparative Study on Online Prediction of TP2 Rolled Copper Tube Wall Thickness Based on Different Proxy Models. | LitMetric

The wall thickness of the TP2 copper tube casting billet is not uniform after a three-roll planetary rotational rolling, which affects the wall thickness uniformity of the copper tube in the subsequent process. In order to study the influence of wall thickness at different positions of copper pipe after rolling on the wall thickness of copper pipe after joint drawing, an online ultrasonic test platform was used to measure the wall thickness of copper pipe after tying, and based on the test data, a finite element model of copper pipe billet was established, and the numerical simulation of joint drawing wall thickness was conducted. Based on the results of the ultrasonic testing experiment and finite element simulation, different neural network models were used to predict the joint tensile wall thickness with the data of the ultrasonic testing experiment as input and the results of finite element simulation as output. The prediction effect of different neural network models was compared, and the results showed that the prediction and fitting effect of the SVM model was better, but overfitting occurred during the fitting process. Furthermore, particle swarm optimization is used to optimize the penalty parameter C and the kernel parameter g in the SVM model. Compared with the traditional SVM model, the PSO-SVM model is more suitable for the prediction of joint tensile wall thickness, which can better guide the production to solve this problem.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma17235685DOI Listing
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11642609PMC

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

wall thickness
36
copper pipe
16
copper tube
12
finite element
12
svm model
12
wall
9
thickness
9
rolling wall
8
thickness copper
8
joint drawing
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!