According to a modern view, cancer no longer follows a purely mechanistic model. Rather, a tumor is conceived as a more complex structure, composed of cancer cells, the activities of which may interact and reshape the so-called tumor microenvironment (TME), leading to preservation of specific tumoral niches and promoting the survival of tumoral stem cells. : Therapeutic strategies must deal with this unique cancer architecture in the near future by widening their range of activities outside the cancer cells and rewiring a TME to ensure it is hostile to cancer growth. Therefore, an intratumoral therapeutic strategy may open the door to a new type of anticancer activity, one that directly injures the tumoral structure while also eliciting an influence on the TME through local and systemic immunomodulation. This review would like to assess the current situation of intratumoral strategies and their clinical implications. We analyzed data from phase I, II, and III trials, comprehensive reviews and relevant clinical and preclinical research, from robust databases, like PUBMED, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov. Intratumoral strategies can be quite variable. It is possible the injection and inhalation of traditional antiblastic agents or immunomodulant agents, or intrapleural administration. Ablation strategy is available, both thermal and photodynamic method. Moreover, TTfields and NPs are analyzed and also brachytherapy is mentioned. Intratumoral therapy can find space in "adjuvant"/perioperative or metastatic settings. Finally, intratumoral strategies allow to synergize their activities with systemic therapies, guaranteeing better local and systemic disease control. Intratumoral strategies are overall promising. Antiblastic/immunomodulant injection and NPs use are especially interesting and intriguing. But, there is generally a lack of phase II and III trials, in particular NPs use need additional experimentation and clinical studies.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639858 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers16233892 | DOI Listing |
Acta Biomater
January 2025
Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States of America; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, United States of America. Electronic address:
Pro-tumoral M2 tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) play a critical role in the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), making them an important therapeutic target for cancer treatment. Approaches for imaging and monitoring M2 TAMs, as well as tracking their changes in response to tumor progression or treatment are highly sought-after but remain underdeveloped. Here, we report an M2-targeted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) probe based on sub-5 nm ultrafine iron oxide nanoparticles (uIONP), featuring an anti-biofouling coating to prevent non-specific macrophage uptake and an M2-specific peptide ligand (M2pep) for active targeting of M2 TAMs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEndocr Relat Cancer
January 2025
L de Mestier, UMR1149, Centre of Research on Inflammation, Université Paris Cité, Paris, 75018, France.
Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (PanNETs) have intra-tumour heterogeneity, notably regarding the Ki-67 index, which is a major prognostic factor. The temporal evolution of PanNET biology is poorly known. We aimed to study the prognostic impact of the temporal evolution of Ki-67 and other molecular markers (MEN1, ATRX/DAXX, PDX1/ARX) in PanNETs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFChin J Cancer Res
December 2024
Department of Neurosurgey, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Jiangxi Medical College, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330006, China.
As a key component of tumor microenvironment, the microbiota has gradually played a key role in cancer research. Particularly in colorectal cancer, the specific population of microbiota within the tumor shows a strong association with the tumor type. Although the existence and potential role of microbiota in tumors have been recognized, the specific associations between the microbiota and tumor tissue and the mechanism of action still need to be further explored.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBiomater Sci
January 2025
Institute of Biomedical Systems and Biotechnology, Peter the Great Saint Petersburg Polytechnic University, St Petersburg, 194064, Russia.
Despite the promising results in cancer treatment, standard monotherapy remains insufficient for a wide range of oncological diseases. Combined therapy can significantly improve therapeutic outcomes compared to single-agent treatments. However, identifying the optimal treatment regimen for combined therapy can be a challenging task.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Immunother Cancer
January 2025
State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, and Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
Background: The biological significance of MAF1, a tumor suppressor, in carcinogenesis and immune response of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unreported. Understanding the underlying mechanisms by which MAF1 enhances anti-tumor immunity in HCC is crucial for developing novel immunotherapy strategies and enhancing clinical responses to treatment for patients with HCC.
Methods: Mice were subjected to hydrodynamic tail vein injections of transposon vectors to overexpress AKT/NRas, or c-Myc, with or without wild-type (WT) or mutant-activated (-4A) MAF1, or short-hairpin MAF1 (shMAF1).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!