Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB) as a boost therapy after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer.

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys

Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, The University of Liverpool, L69 3GE, United Kingdom; The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, 65 Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L7 8YA, United Kingdom. Electronic address:

Published: December 2024

Background And Purpose: Radical surgery following neoadjuvant therapy is the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. A Contact X-ray Brachytherapy (CXB) boost can alternatively be used to treat residual disease post neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation, especially in patients who are not suitable for or do not wish to have surgery. Its role has mostly been studied to date in low to intermediate-risk patients. We have now evaluated the utility of CXB-boost in high-risk rectal cancers after their tumours have been significantly downstaged by neoadjuvant (chemo)radiation.

Materials And Methods: Oncological outcomes and treatment tolerability were evaluated in 328 patients based on rectal cancer treatment risk stratification: low/intermediate risk (cT1-3ab, N0-1, M0, no extramural invasion (EMVI), mesorectal fascia (MRF) involvement >1mm) and high-risk (cT3cd-4/N2, M0, MRF≤1mm and/or EMVI positive).

Results: With median follow-up of 33(IQR:15-54) months and median age of 73(IQR:62-80) years, no significant differences were found between low/intermediate and high-risk groups in clinical complete response (78% vs 73%, p=0.32), local regrowth (16.6% vs 22.4%, p=0.41), nodal (1.8% vs 5.8%, p=0.051) or regional (1.3% vs 2.9%, p=0.33) relapse, or post-radiation toxicities (p=0.16). However, the high-risk group had a higher distant relapse rate (21.2% vs 10.7%, p=0.01), with no significant differences in 3-year organ preservation (80% vs 87%, p=0.25), 5-year disease-free (DFS) (62% vs 64%, p=0.46), or overall (OS) survivals (67% vs 64%, p=0.88). Longer treatment time, treatment gap >24 weeks between therapies, and administration of a higher than standard CXB dose were newly identified factors that negatively impacted outcomes.

Conclusions: High-risk rectal cancer patients treated with CXB-boost had more distant relapses, but comparable locoregional tumour control, organ preservation, DFS and OS to lower-risk patients, with acceptable toxicities. CXB-boost is therefore a viable option for selected high-risk rectal cancer patients. Timely reassessment, prompt referral, and CXB dose optimisation are crucial for improving outcomes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.113DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rectal cancer
20
high-risk rectal
12
contact x-ray
8
x-ray brachytherapy
8
brachytherapy cxb
8
cxb boost
8
neoadjuvant chemoradiation
8
locally advanced
8
advanced rectal
8
organ preservation
8

Similar Publications

Predicting intermediate-risk prostate cancer using machine learning.

Int Urol Nephrol

January 2025

Faculty of Medical Sciences, Pharmacology and Toxicology Department, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.

Purposes: Intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR PCa) is the most common risk group for localized prostate cancer. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model that utilizes biopsy predictors to estimate the probability of IR PCa and assess its performance compared to the traditional clinical model.

Methods: Between January 2017 and December 2022, patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values of ≤ 20 ng/mL underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsies.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival in ypT0-2 N0 rectal cancer.

Int J Colorectal Dis

January 2025

Medical Oncology Department, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

Purpose: The role of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients downstaged to ypT0-2 N0 after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and surgery is still debated. This study investigates the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcomes in this patient population.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed hospital records of rectal cancer cases from Shefa Al Orman Cancer Hospital between January 2016 and December 2020, focusing on patients downstaged to ypT0-2 N0 after neoadjuvant CRT and surgery.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Anorectal melanoma (ARM) is rare and highly lethal neoplasm. It has a poorer prognosis compared with cutaneous ones. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become the preferred method of nodal staging method for cutaneous melanoma.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Obesity presents a significant public health challenge, known to escalate the risk of colorectal cancer twofold. The potential advantages of employing robotic technology in colorectal surgery for obese individuals remain mostly unexplored. A comprehensive search of articles retrieved from Scopus, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library for the duration of January 2014 to March 2024 was performed, without language limitations.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Radical cystectomy for patients who previously underwent both radical prostatectomy and prostatic bed radiation is technically challenging.

Case Presentation: A 78-year-old man with a history of radical prostatectomy and salvage radiation for prostate cancer was referred to our hospital for radical treatment of bladder cancer. After two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, he underwent robot-assisted radical cystectomy with real-time transrectal ultrasound guidance during dissection of the rectovesical space to minimize the risk of rectal injury.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!