AI Article Synopsis

  • A study was conducted to evaluate how effective a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) and image processing analysis are at detecting oral cancers using non-invasive fluorescence visualization, involving 1,076 patients with various oral conditions.
  • The study found that fluorescence visualization loss (FVL) was highly effective in identifying oral cancer, with rates of sensitivity at 96.9% and specificity at 77.3%, while the DCNN showed overall high recall and precision for classifying different oral diseases.
  • The results indicated that the DCNN achieved an impressive sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 92.7% for detecting oral cancer, with an average accuracy across all lesions of 85.1%.

Article Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to determine the effectiveness of screening using image processing analysis and a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) to classify oral cancers using non-invasive fluorescence visualization. The study included 1076 patients with diseases of the oral mucosa (oral cancer, oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs), benign disease) or normal mucosa. For oral cancer, the rate of fluorescence visualization loss (FVL) was 96.9%. Regarding image processing, multivariate analysis identified FVL, the coefficient of variation of the G value (CV), and the G value ratio (VRatio) as factors significantly associated with oral cancer detection. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting oral cancer were 96.9% and 77.3% for FVL, 80.8% and 86.4% for CV, and 84.9% and 87.8% for VRatio, respectively. Regarding the performance of the DCNN for image classification, recall was 0.980 for oral cancer, 0.760 for OPMDs, 0.960 for benign disease, and 0.739 for normal mucosa. Precision was 0.803, 0.821, 0.842, and 0.941, respectively. The F-score was 0.883, 0.789, 0.897, and 0.828, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for detecting oral cancer were 98.0% and 92.7%, respectively. The accuracy for all lesions was 0.851, average recall was 0.860, average precision was 0.852, and average F-score was 0.849.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2024.11.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

oral cancer
28
image processing
12
fluorescence visualization
12
oral
10
processing analysis
8
analysis deep
8
deep convolutional
8
convolutional neural
8
neural network
8
mucosa oral
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!