A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Limitations of the Impagliazzo-Nisan-Wigderson Pseudorandom Generator Against Permutation Branching Programs. | LitMetric

The classic Impagliazzo-Nisan-Wigderson (INW) pseudorandom generator (PRG) (STOC '94) for space-bounded computation uses a seed of length to fool ordered branching programs of length , width , and alphabet size to within error . A series of works have shown that the analysis of the INW generator can be improved for the class of branching programs or the more general branching programs, improving the dependence on the length to or . However, when also considering the dependence on the other parameters, these analyses still fall short of the optimal PRG seed length . In this paper, we prove that any "spectral analysis" of the INW generator requires seed length to fool ordered permutation branching programs of length , width , and alphabet size to within error . By "spectral analysis" we mean an analysis of the INW generator that relies only on the spectral expansion of the graphs used to construct the generator; this encompasses all prior analyses of the INW generator. Our lower bound matches the upper bound of Braverman-Rao-Raz-Yehudayoff (FOCS 2010, SICOMP 2014) for regular branching programs of alphabet size except for a gap between their term and our term. It also matches the upper bounds of Koucký-Nimbhorkar-Pudlák (STOC 2011), De (CCC 2011), and Steinke (ECCC 2012) for constant-width ( ) permutation branching programs of alphabet size to within a constant factor. To fool permutation branching programs in the measure of , we prove that any spectral analysis of the INW generator requires a seed of length when the width is at least polynomial in ( ), matching the recent upper bound of Hoza-Pyne-Vadhan (ITCS 2021) to within a constant factor.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634949PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00453-024-01251-2DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

branching programs
32
inw generator
20
permutation branching
16
seed length
16
alphabet size
16
length width
12
analysis inw
12
generator
8
pseudorandom generator
8
branching
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!