Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The classic Impagliazzo-Nisan-Wigderson (INW) pseudorandom generator (PRG) (STOC '94) for space-bounded computation uses a seed of length to fool ordered branching programs of length , width , and alphabet size to within error . A series of works have shown that the analysis of the INW generator can be improved for the class of branching programs or the more general branching programs, improving the dependence on the length to or . However, when also considering the dependence on the other parameters, these analyses still fall short of the optimal PRG seed length . In this paper, we prove that any "spectral analysis" of the INW generator requires seed length to fool ordered permutation branching programs of length , width , and alphabet size to within error . By "spectral analysis" we mean an analysis of the INW generator that relies only on the spectral expansion of the graphs used to construct the generator; this encompasses all prior analyses of the INW generator. Our lower bound matches the upper bound of Braverman-Rao-Raz-Yehudayoff (FOCS 2010, SICOMP 2014) for regular branching programs of alphabet size except for a gap between their term and our term. It also matches the upper bounds of Koucký-Nimbhorkar-Pudlák (STOC 2011), De (CCC 2011), and Steinke (ECCC 2012) for constant-width ( ) permutation branching programs of alphabet size to within a constant factor. To fool permutation branching programs in the measure of , we prove that any spectral analysis of the INW generator requires a seed of length when the width is at least polynomial in ( ), matching the recent upper bound of Hoza-Pyne-Vadhan (ITCS 2021) to within a constant factor.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11634949 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00453-024-01251-2 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!