A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Breast hamartomas associated with epithelial atypia and malignancy: are there specific clinical, radiological or pathological features that identify at risk patients? | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to examine whether specific clinical, radiological, or histological features can distinguish breast hamartomas associated with atypia/malignancy from benign hamartomas without such complications.
  • A review of 450 hamartomas from 2010 to 2023 revealed that only 4.2% were linked to atypia or malignancy.
  • Significant findings included older average age and larger size in complex hamartomas, with MRI successfully detecting malignancy in all examined cases, underscoring a need for improved detection methods.

Article Abstract

Purpose: Breast hamartomas are rarely associated with epithelial atypia or malignancy. Since the introduction of digital mammography in the UK from 2008, hamartoma detection has increased. The aim of this study was to identify if there are characteristic clinical, radiological or histological features that distinguish hamartomas with intralesional atypia/malignancy (complex hamartomas, CH) or ipsilateral/contralateral atypia/malignancy (non-CH) from those without atypia/malignancy at diagnosis (other benign hamartomas, BH).

Methods: We performed a retrospective single-institution review of 450 hamartomas reported between 2010 and 2023. Anonymised H&E sections and imaging of CH and non-CH were reviewed to identify distinguishing features.

Results: 13,441 benign breast lesions were biopsied/resected between 2010 and 2023 including 450 hamartomas (3.3%), 19 of which (4.2%) were associated with atypia or malignancy. 14 were analysed further (7 CH; 7 non-CH). The mean age of CH plus non-CH patients was significantly higher than patients with BH (47.5 vs. 40.6 years; p = 0.03). The mean size of CH was greater than non-CH (32.1 mm vs.17.6 mm; p = 0.06). There was a statistically significantly higher incidence of atypical/malignant lobular lesions (ALH/LCIS/ILC) in CH vs. non-CH (42.9% vs 0%; p = 0.05). MRI was performed in 2 CH and 3 non-CH; in all 5 the associated malignancy was detected. There was no significant difference between the CH and non-CH group in ultrasound/mammographic features, other hamartoma histological features or other associated benign breast changes.

Conclusions: Ultrasound/mammogram are not sufficiently sensitive to identify hamartomas with associated atypia/malignancy. Certain hamartoma features may preferentially be associated with atypia/malignancy and which merit further radiological and/or detailed histological investigation.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07577-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

atypia malignancy
12
breast hamartomas
8
hamartomas associated
8
associated epithelial
8
epithelial atypia
8
clinical radiological
8
histological features
8
non-ch
8
450 hamartomas
8
2010 2023
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!