Background And Objectives: This study introduced and evaluated the efficacy of an ultrasonic bony aspirator (UBA) in revision endoscopic sinus surgery and compared the outcomes to those of the traditional cold instrument approach.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 57 patients who underwent revision endoscopic sinus surgery between June 2010 and December 2017, 17 patients with a UBA approach and 40 patients with traditional instruments.

Results: Median Lund-Kennedy scores showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups at 3 months (p=0.004). Synechiae occurred in 17.6% and 35% of cases in the UBA and traditional groups, respectively. The mean operative time was significantly shorter in the traditional group (p=0.001).

Conclusion: The use of a UBA in revision endoscopic sinus surgery was safe and effective.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11524372PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.18787/jr.2022.00411DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

revision endoscopic
16
endoscopic sinus
16
sinus surgery
16
uba revision
8
assessing feasibility
4
feasibility safety
4
safety ultrasonic
4
ultrasonic bone
4
bone aspirator
4
revision
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!