A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Factors impacting sleep center no-show rates post hospital discharge utilizing geospatial coding in Appalachia. | LitMetric

Study Objectives: Screening for early detection of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in hospitalized patients has been shown to reduce readmission rates. However, post-discharge polysomnography for confirmation of diagnosis is required. We analyzed factors for "no-shows" using geospatial techniques.

Methods: Data were obtained between September 2019 and September 2023. The outcome for the study was patient's no-show rate (non-compliant) for polysomnography post hospital discharge. Predictors included patient age, gender, BMI, health literacy, distressed community index (DCI) score and distance to sleep center for the patient's zip code of residence. Logistic regression was applied to estimate odds of patient compliance at the patient-level utilizing geospatial mapping technique. Geographically weighted logistic regression was applied to estimate the odds of a zip-code having compliant patients.

Results: Of the 1318 hospitalized patients established as high risk for SDB and referred for an overnight sleep study who were able to be geocoded, 228 were compliant and 1130 were non-compliant. In non-spatial regression analyses, health literacy (aOR = 1.06, 95%CI = 1.03, 1.09), age (aOR=0.99, 95% CI=0.98, 0.99), and drive time (aOR=0.95, 95% CI = 0.92, 0.97) were identified as statistically significant predictors of patient compliance. Spatial regression analyses identified areas that had high and low predictive probability of patient compliance, as well as which community level factors were co-occurring in those areas.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that both patient-level factors and the community where patients live may impact no-show rates. Health literacy was identified as a key modifiable predictor at the patient level. At the community level, we found that predicted probability of patient compliance varied throughout the state. Efforts should focus on enhancing patient education at the individual level and understanding geographical factors to improve compliance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.11494DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

patient compliance
16
health literacy
12
sleep center
8
no-show rates
8
post hospital
8
hospital discharge
8
utilizing geospatial
8
hospitalized patients
8
logistic regression
8
regression applied
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!