A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A comparative study of storage solutions on the biomechanical preservation of human saphenous veins. | LitMetric

A comparative study of storage solutions on the biomechanical preservation of human saphenous veins.

J Biomech

Department of Mechanics & Engineering, College of Architecture & Environment, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China; Med-X Center for Informatics, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, China. Electronic address:

Published: January 2025

Storage solutions have a significant impact on the physiological properties of saphenous veins (SV), yet their effects on the biomechanics remained unclear. This study investigated how different storage solutions affect the biomechanical properties of SV. The goal was to find a solution that minimally impacts SV biomechanics, providing an effective method for SV preservation. A total of 108 SV samples (54 axial, 54 circumferential) were randomly divided into four groups: Baseline (tested within 24 h after surgical removal), and three stored for 72 h-sodium lactated ringer's solution (SLR), physiological saline (PS), and Air. Uniaxial tensile experiments were performed, and differences in elastic modulus, maximum stress, and average stress-strain curves were evaluated. In the axial direction, the elastic modulus of SVs stored in SLR was significantly higher than in PS (7.21 ± 2.78 MPa vs. 3.90 ± 1.54 MPa, p = 0.009) and similar to Baseline (vs. 8.52 ± 3.43 MPa), while the PS group did not differ significantly from the Air group (3.90 ± 1.54 MPa vs. 2.50 ± 1.34 MPa, p > 0.99). The maximum stress in SLR was similar to Baseline (1.92 ± 0.82 MPa vs. 1.91 ± 0.58 MPa) and significantly higher than in PS (vs. 1.05 ± 0.56 MPa, p = 0.002). Similar trends could also be observed in the circumferential direction. PS significantly impairs the mechanical performance of SVs, while short-term storage in SLR can effectively preserve the biomechanical characteristics of SVs. SLR may be considered as an effective short-term storage solution for SV.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112460DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

storage solutions
12
saphenous veins
8
elastic modulus
8
maximum stress
8
short-term storage
8
storage
5
slr
5
comparative study
4
study storage
4
solutions biomechanical
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!