Diagnostic Accuracy of Active MMP-8 Point-of-Care Test in Peri-Implantitis.

Aim:  This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the active matrix metalloproteinase-8 (aMMP-8) quantitative chairside point-of-care (PoC) lateral flow immunotest for peri-implant diseases, and it sought to correlate aMMP-8 levels with clinical parameters to determine its effectiveness as a biomarker for peri-implantitis.

Materials And Methods:  A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Periodontology and Implant Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece. Participants included systemically healthy individuals with at least one implant loaded for more than 1 year, who had not received periodontal treatment or antibiotics in the preceding 6 months. Exclusion criteria included diabetes and immune-compromising conditions. Peri-implant sulcular fluid (PISF) samples were collected from the mesiobuccal or distobuccal site of the implant. The quantitative chairside PoC lateral flow immunotest for peri-implant diseases (ImplantSafe test) and ORALyzer digital reader were used to analyze PISF, with results expressed in ng/mL. Clinical parameters such as bleeding on probing (BOP), probing depth (PD), recession (REC), and clinical attachment level (CAL) were measured at six sites per implant using a 15-mm scale periodontal probe.

Results:  No significant differences were found in age, gender distribution, or smoking status between the healthy/mucositis and peri-implantitis groups. The peri-implantitis group showed significantly higher mean percentages of BOP (57.58 ± 31.73 vs. 18.79 ± 24.17), PD (4.59 ± 1.22 mm vs. 2.94 ± 0.78 mm), and CAL (5.21 ± 1.72 mm vs. 3.05 ± 0.81 mm). aMMP-8 levels were also significantly higher in the peri-implantitis group (53.39 ± 49.70 vs. 22.03 ± 32.87). The diagnostic test demonstrated a sensitivity of 81.25% and specificity of 74.07%, with an area under the curve of 79.6%, indicating overall good accuracy in distinguishing between positive and negative conditions.

Conclusion:  The aMMP-8 is a promising biomarker for peri-implantitis, showing elevated levels in affected patients. The aMMP-8 chairside test demonstrates high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, supporting its use in early detection and monitoring of peri-implant diseases. Further research is needed to establish standardized protocols for its clinical application and to explore its long-term predictive value in implant care.