Objective: To evaluate South Asian (SA) and White (WH) inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) phenotypes, and to explore treatment approach variations between these cohorts in the UK using the IBD BioResource database.
Design: Differences between WH and SA IBD patients were analysed using demographic, phenotypic and outcome data. Drug utilisation patterns and surgical outcomes were assessed in propensity score-matched (PSM) cohorts with multivariable logistic regression, Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Results: 30,997 eligible patients were included. UC was the predominant disease subtype in SA (p<0.001). SA were younger at diagnosis (p<0.001), had a male preponderance (p<0.001), and were less likely to have a smoking history at diagnosis. The SA CD phenotype differed from WH, with less ileal (SA 30.3%, WH 38.4%, p=0.008) and stricturing (SA 16.9%, WH 25.6%, p<0.001) disease, but more perianal disease (SA 38.5%, WH 32.2%, p=0.009). More SA UC patients had extensive disease (SA 41.7%, WH 34.1%, p<0.001). In PSM cohorts, comparing treatments, there were no differences in 5-aminosalicylate, corticosteroid, thiopurine, anti-TNF or vedolizumab use. Survival analysis in matched cohorts showed no difference in time to surgery (CD) or colectomy (UC), and SA ethnicity was not associated with a difference in risk of surgery/colectomy.
Conclusion: Demographic and phenotypic differences exist between UK SA and WH IBD patients, highlighting distinct ethnicity-related variance, and the need for a research focus on under-represented populations. In comparing matched SA and WH patients, no disparity in medical and surgical IBD therapy in UK healthcare has been demonstrated: treatment is consistent regardless of ethnicity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae186 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!