AI Article Synopsis

  • Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) is a significant hospital pathogen, and effective control relies on advanced molecular epidemiological tools.
  • Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is still widely used in clinical labs, but with the decline in PFGE equipment availability, the Bezdíček multilocus sequence typing (MLST) scheme has been proposed as a more accurate alternative for analyzing genetic similarities among VREfm strains.
  • Comparing both MLST schemes with PFGE, the study found that the Bezdíček scheme offers improved outbreak visualization and higher discriminatory power, making it a valuable tool for managing VREfm infections in healthcare settings.

Article Abstract

Vancomycin-resistant (VREfm) is a major nosocomial pathogen, and molecular epidemiological tools are crucial for controlling its spread. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) is still used in clinical laboratories despite the increased accessibility of whole-genome sequencing (WGS). As PFGE equipment is no longer commercially available, clinical laboratories need alternative tools. Highly standardized multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is one option. However, the original MLST scheme for , designed in 2002, showed inconsistencies with WGS-based typing. Therefore, the new Bezdíček MLST scheme, which offers more accurate genetic similarity based on genome-wide data, has recently been proposed. To clarify its clinical utility in analyzing nosocomial VREfm transmission, we compared both MLST schemes with PFGE using 68 VREfm isolates collected during an outbreak at a Japanese tertiary medical center in 2019. PFGE analysis identified nine clusters among the 68 strains, including two predominant clusters. The original scheme identified five sequence types (STs), of which 82.4% (56/68) were ST192. The Bezdíček scheme identified nine sequence types (STs), subdividing the original ST192 into ST1162 (30/56), ST610 (25/56), and ST895 (1/56). Simpson's index of diversity values were 0.635, 0.317, and 0.648 for PFGE, the original scheme, and the Bezdíček scheme, respectively. Combining the Bezdíček scheme with admission records provided clearer outbreak visualization, indicating that two distinct STs independently caused sequential outbreaks. With high discriminatory power comparable with PFGE and global availability, the Bezdíček scheme is a practical and valuable tool for controlling nosocomial VREfm infections in clinical laboratories.IMPORTANCEIn areas where vancomycin-resistant is common, hospital-acquired infections pose a considerable threat to patients' lives owing to treatment difficulties. Although whole-genome sequencing-based typing has logically become the new reference standard and its accessibility is growing, many clinical laboratories still lack the fundamental resources to exploit its full potential. Limited availability of the traditional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis test in clinical settings has necessitated the use of alternative tools such as Bezdíček multilocus sequence typing. This study tested the clinical utility of the Bezdíček scheme by comparing it with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Designed using Czech isolates, this scheme showed comparable discriminatory powers with the traditional method for geographically distinct Japanese isolates and clearly visualized outbreaks. These findings suggest that the Bezdíček scheme is a potential alternative to pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for identifying hospital transmission of vancomycin-resistant in clinical laboratories.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02131-24DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bezdíček scheme
24
pulsed-field gel
16
gel electrophoresis
16
clinical laboratories
16
multilocus sequence
12
sequence typing
12
scheme
12
sequential outbreaks
8
japanese tertiary
8
tertiary medical
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!