A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A comprehensive comparison of bias correction methods in climate model simulations: Application on ERA5-Land across different temporal resolutions. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Climate data is essential for managing water resources and is utilized in various hydrological analyses beyond just climate change studies.
  • Though climate models are becoming more accurate over time, their outputs often require adjustments to be applicable for local contexts.
  • This study evaluates various statistical and machine learning methods for bias correction of climate data at different time scales, revealing distinct performance trends for correcting precipitation and temperature data.

Article Abstract

Climate data plays a crucial role in water resources management, which is becoming an increasingly relevant asset in all types of hydrological analysis not only for climate change studies but for various horizon forecasting. Though the ever-improving accuracy of climate models' spatial and temporal resolution has surged the validity of their outputs, the products of global and regional climate models need to be corrected to be reliably used for local purposes. Here, we propose a comprehensive analysis of statistical univariate and multivariate, as well as machine learning methods for bias correction, which are compared on different temporal scales, ranging from hourly time steps to monthly aggregations, in an environment of complex Alpine orthography, using ERA5-Land reanalysis data. The results reveal different trends in the performance of the bias correction methods for precipitation and temperature across the various time resolutions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625273PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40352DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bias correction
12
correction methods
8
climate
5
comprehensive comparison
4
comparison bias
4
methods climate
4
climate model
4
model simulations
4
simulations application
4
application era5-land
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!