A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

What is the influence of the operator on the long-term survival of posterior partial lithium disilicate restorations in an undergraduate setting? | LitMetric

What is the influence of the operator on the long-term survival of posterior partial lithium disilicate restorations in an undergraduate setting?

J Dent

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University Medical Center Groningen, The University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Department of Special Dental Care, Martini Hospital, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Published: December 2024

Objective: To evaluate the influence of the (undergraduate) operator on the survival and success rate of posterior partial lithium disilicate restorations.

Materials And Methods: Patients who received at least one posterior partial lithium disilicate restoration between 2009 and 2019 by undergraduates at the Center for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene in Groningen were included. Operator- (academic year (4th, 5th, 6th year)), patient- (presence of a nightguard, caries risk, age), tooth- (endodontic status, inlay/onlay, position of the restoration outline) and material-related factors (cement type, rubber dam use, Immediate Dentin Sealing) on the survival and success rate were analyzed using multilevel Cox regression (p < 0.05).

Results: In total, 637 restorations were placed in 373 patients. On the level of survival, 100 restorations failed during the observation period (median follow-up: 70 months, interquartile range 48-99 months): 26 extractions, 61 restoration replacements and 13 biological complications. The overall 5- and 10-year cumulative survival rates were 89.1 % (95 % CI: 86.5 %-91.7 %) and 77.6 % (95 % CI: 73.1 % - 82.5 %) respectively. Multilevel Cox regression showed a medium to high caries risk (HR: 1.57; 95 % CI: 1.21 - 2.04) and an approximal outline located within 3 mm of the bone (HR: 1.52; 95 % CI: 1.05 - 2.22) as significant risk factors for failure. The academic year had no statistically significant effect.

Conclusion: The 10-year survival and success of lithium disilicate posterior partial indirect restorations placed by undergraduates was not significantly affected by the academic year of the operator.

Clinical Significance: When a clear treatment protocol is followed, patient- and tooth-related factors rather than academic year of the operator appear to have a significant influence on the quality of posterior partial lithium disilicate restorations.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105522DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

posterior partial
20
lithium disilicate
20
partial lithium
16
academic year
16
survival success
12
disilicate restorations
8
success rate
8
caries risk
8
multilevel cox
8
cox regression
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!