AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on using deep learning to improve the speed and quality of radiation treatment planning by predicting patient-specific 3D dose distributions in real time.
  • It analyzed the impact of training dataset size and model complexity on the accuracy of dose predictions for 1250 prostate patients, using various sizes of neural network models.
  • Results showed that more training data increases prediction accuracy, with the most effective model achieving low prediction errors in dose distribution despite not reaching a plateau in accuracy at 1000 training patients, indicating potential for further optimization.

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose: Fast, high-quality deep learning (DL) prediction of patient-specific 3D dose distributions can enable instantaneous treatment planning (IP), in which the treating physician can evaluate the dose and approve the plan immediately after contouring, rather than days later. This would greatly benefit clinical workload, patient waiting times and treatment quality. IP requires that predicted dose distributions closely match the ground truth. This study examines how training dataset size and model size affect dose prediction accuracy for Erasmus-iCycle GT plans to enable IP.

Materials And Methods: For 1250 prostate patients, dose distributions were automatically generated using Erasmus-iCycle. Hierarchically Densely Connected U-Nets with 2/3/4/5/6 pooling layers were trained with datasets of 50/100/250/500/1000 patients, using a validation set of 100 patients. A fixed test set of 150 patients was used for evaluations.

Results: For all model sizes, prediction accuracy increased with the number of training patients, without levelling off at 1000 patients. For 4-6 level models with 1000 training patients, prediction accuracies were high and comparable. For 6 levels and 1000 training patients, the median prediction errors and interquartile ranges for PTV V, rectum V and bladder V were 0.01 [-0.06,0.15], 0.01 [-0.20,0.29] and -0.02 [-0.27,0.27] %-point. Dose prediction times were around 1.2 s.

Conclusion: Although even for 1000 training patients there was no convergence in obtained prediction accuracy yet, the accuracy for the 6-level model with 1000 training patients may be adequate for the pursued instantaneous planning, which is subject of further research.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110662DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

training patients
20
1000 training
16
dose prediction
12
dose distributions
12
prediction accuracy
12
patients
10
deep learning
8
prediction
8
instantaneous treatment
8
treatment planning
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!