Introduction: Placenta previa and Placenta Accreta Spectrum are life-threatening obstetric conditions that are challenging to diagnose accurately. Currently, there is no biochemical parameter available for their diagnosis. The aim of our study is to investigate the potential of Elabela as a laboratory marker that could predict placenta previa and placenta accreta, both of which can lead to severe, life-threatening complications for the mother.
Methods: In this study, which was conducted prospectively in two tertiary centers between 2020 and 2022, Elabela levels were examined in patient groups with placental insertion and invasion anomalies. SPSS program was used for comparative statistical analysis between groups.
Results: Of the 67 analyzed patients, 32 were in the control group, 12 were in the previa group, and 23 were in the accreta group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding age, BMI, number of curettages, presence of previous cesarean section, and smoking status. The Elabela level was measured at 135.6 ± 72.1 in the control group, 988.3 ± 925.5 in the previa group, and 376 ± 364.6 in the accreta group, with a statistically significant difference between the groups. The cut-off value of Elabela levels in the previa group was determined to be 304, with a sensitivity of 83.30 % and a specificity of 83.60 % (AUC = 0.909). In the accreta group, the cut-off value was 195.5, with a sensitivity of 60.90 % and a specificity of 61.40 % (AUC = 0.658).
Discussion: By showing that the prediction of placenta previa and placenta acreata can be made with a biochemical parameter in our study, young researchers will focus more on this subject and thus make many contributions to science.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2024.12.001 | DOI Listing |
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kathmandu Medical College Public Limited, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Obstet Gynecol
December 2024
Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Social Research Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom; Population Science, Huntsman Cancer Institute, the Department of Family and Consumer Studies, the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, and the Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City; Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany; the Helsinki Institute for Demography and Population Health, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland; and the Max Planck - University of Helsinki Center for Social Inequalities in Population Health, Rostock, Germany and Helsinki, Finland.
Arch Gynecol Obstet
December 2024
Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare obese and non-obese women with multiple pregnancies to determine the effects on pregnancy, delivery, and neonatal outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective population-based study utilizing data collected between 2004 and 2014 inclusively, from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-Nationwide Inpatient Sample. A total of 137,303 multiple pregnancies were analyzed; 130,542 (95%) were non-obese, while 6761 (5%) were obese.
Front Med (Lausanne)
December 2024
Institute for the Care of the Mother and Child, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czechia.
J Clin Med
December 2024
Third Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Agiou Dimitriou, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!