Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
We explore the effect of China's unique environmental credit rating pilot policy on loan contract terms between firms and banks. First, we find that the environmental credit rating policy increases the amount of bank loans received by firms and lowers their borrowing costs. These results remain robust across a range of sensitivity tests. Second, the mechanism tests identify signal transmission and risk avoidance as two key factors facilitating the positive effects. Cross-sectional analyses find that the positive effects of environmental credit rating policy are more pronounced in contexts with non-state-owned firms, banks performing well in environmental responsibility, weak bank-firm relationships, and suboptimal business environments. Finally, the environmental credit rating policy also contributes to optimizing the loan structure and extending loan maturity.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123543 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!